Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2020, 10:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,112 Times in 981 Posts
I dunno, seal it up pretty good, and use a submarine system to remove C02 and you could get away with a fairly small tank of O2. The tanks on the space station aren't that big. The pilots have to breathe their own separate air anyways, by law

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-06-2020, 11:12 AM   #12 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid View Post
Air can be stored quite effectively in bottles when the ICE is running
Sure, but it also adds some weight and complexity. Holding compressed air for the engine starters is a whole different matter than having to store enough air to keep an airliner pressurized while cruising only on the electric motors or gliding. Considering some earlier pressurized aircraft had engine-driven compressors instead of resorting to air bleeding from the engine's compressors, maybe an accessory compressor driven by an electric motor shouldn't be so out of question. But anyway, it wouldn't surprise me if an electric motor becomes a viable replacement for both the reduction gear (when applied) and the accessory gearbox of an airliner engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2020, 04:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,465

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
I made housings for the shuttle high-pressure fuel turbopumps at my first job out of school. 71,140 hp shaft horsepower from a pump a little bigger than a Chevy big block.
That is crazy... a fuel pump that is 71,140 horsepower. It must be moving a swimming pool amount of fuel in a minute or something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Sure, but it also adds some weight and complexity. Holding compressed air for the engine starters is a whole different matter than having to store enough air to keep an airliner pressurized while cruising only on the electric motors or gliding. Considering some earlier pressurized aircraft had engine-driven compressors instead of resorting to air bleeding from the engine's compressors, maybe an accessory compressor driven by an electric motor shouldn't be so out of question. But anyway, it wouldn't surprise me if an electric motor becomes a viable replacement for both the reduction gear (when applied) and the accessory gearbox of an airliner engine.
It would be pretty simple to have an inlet on a high pressure surface of the aircraft provide the higher pressure.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2020, 06:17 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,696
Thanks: 7,775
Thanked 8,585 Times in 7,069 Posts
Quote:
It must be moving a swimming pool amount of fuel in a minute or something
A skyscraper full of fuel and oxidizer in 4 minutes. See https://youtu.be/LbH1ZDImaI8?t=22 for a diagram of the competing open cycle, closed cycle and full flow variants.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
ldjessee00 (05-08-2020)
Old 05-06-2020, 06:56 PM   #15 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
That is crazy... a fuel pump that is 71,140 horsepower. It must be moving a swimming pool amount of fuel in a minute or something.
The Shuttle burned 535,000 gallons of liquid fuel in a little less than 9 minutes.

According to NASA, each pump (there were 3) would drain a swimming pool in 28 seconds. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshal...r/ssme_11.html

The High Pressure Pump (HPLT) was fed by a Low Pressure Pump (LPLT) The LPLT pressurized the fuel to 275 psi and then HPLT increased that to 6515 psi.

Full story here: https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle...p/engines.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
freebeard (05-06-2020), Piotrsko (05-07-2020)
Old 05-07-2020, 12:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
It would be pretty simple to have an inlet on a high pressure surface of the aircraft provide the higher pressure.
You mean some sort of ram-air? Doesn't seem so easy to increase air pressure to the same extent now applied to the combined HVAC and pressurizing system of modern airliners.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com