Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2010, 03:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG All Day
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 684

1NZ-FE (Year 1) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
Last 3: 34.02 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 2) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 33.32 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 3) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 35.32 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 4) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 34 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 5) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 26.87 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 6,7,8) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 28.6 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 9,10,11) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 27.8 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 12,13,14) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 32.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Airpanes do it.......

I know this sounds ridiculous-ish but you know how people but spoilers on their trunk to make the wind push them down for more traction, if that works, couldnt you put one on backwards and have the air pull your car up, falsely removing weight, kinda like people in those air tunnels, the are is pushing you up so fast you float up (like being 200 pounds less)

Look at my ridiculous picture if you want an idea of what im thinking like:

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	wtf.png
Views:	213
Size:	24.0 KB
ID:	6806  
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-10-2010, 03:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 155

Silver Bullet - '03 Mazda Protege LX
90 day: 29.51 mpg (US)

Silver Bullet - '03 Mazda Protege LX
90 day: 37.06 mpg (US)

Blaze - '17 Ford Escape
Thanks: 23
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
you could absolutely create lift, but with lift comes drag. The short answer is, it wouldn't help.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 03:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,752

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,339
Thanked 751 Times in 477 Posts
  1. By creating lift you may lose traction. Good for slightly reducing rolling resistance, but horrible if you actually want control over the car.
  2. You reduce weight, but not mass. Mass is what you have to haul up every hill, and what you have to pull each time you accelerate.And what tries to pull you out of the road when turning without enough traction (b/c you have too much lift, for example).
  3. There are ways to create lift without a big ol' spoiler sitting in the airstream. For example certain rear hatch and rear diffuser angles will increase lift (Cz on the drawings below), but usually at the cost of increasing drag (Cx).



__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
Daox (09-10-2010)
Old 09-10-2010, 04:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
It looks like a great scheme, but in aeronautical engineering they have something called lift induced drag.
Basicly if you want to exploit the lift of a wing, you'll have to live with its drag as well.


But airplanes are often hypermiling, with flight crew incentives to do so.

Reducing fresh air to the cabine is like switching the car's AC off.
If you're getting a headache aboard, this is often why.

Changes in traffic control have the effect of coasting.
Rather than having approaching aircraft fly stepped approaches where they repeatedly descent and level out in horizontal flight (using fuel and causing noise), ATC improvements are now allowing for continuous descent approaches - "engine on coasting" down to the runway.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 09:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
Any wing that fits on a highway will be less efficient at supporting weight than wheels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 10:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
That would be very dangerous at highway speeds. The mass doesn't go anywhere, and you'd be losing traction.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 11:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
There is another way to reduce weight on the wheels, drive it off a cliff. It is about as advisable.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com