Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-12-2012, 04:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Doni_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 26
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HypermilerAX View Post
...
I didn't imagine I gained that much with the mods since I did them one by one. When you change all at once, you see the difference.
Hi HypermilerAX,

I have been following up your FE figures on spritmonitor.de for a long time. Congratulation for your result.
Yes I read about the 1360ccm engine that is less reliable but the 1527ccm engine is much better.
My next car will be an AX, presently I drive a Volvo 244 with a diesel engine (2383ccm, more accurately after engine rebuilt: 2414ccm). I usualy measure 4,6L/100km on steady 80km/h. My car weight is 1360kg so I hope I will be able to reach the 2.7-2.6L with my future AX.

I estimated this figure on the base of a Hungarian used car test in which the old Citroen was compared with the new Mazda 2. The AX (1360ccm) won with 2,99L/100km. The test consisted of city, road and highway drive.

Keep us informed about your further results.
Doni_99

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-13-2012, 06:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
Thanks for the support. It's nice knowing so many people follow me (I also get a lot of mails).

4,6 l at 80 is pretty good for that type of car considering the size of the engine and bad Cd.
I currently drive a Peugeot 305 wagon 1.8 turbo diesel (maintenance on the AX) and I get around 4,5 l at 90.

I hope for you you can get such good figures, but you'll see it's not easy.

It's surprising a test returned only 3 l on the AX, usually car testers drive rather fast. Do you happen to have this test on a file ?
__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2012, 06:22 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Doni_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 26
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HypermilerAX View Post
It's surprising a test returned only 3 l on the AX, usually car testers drive rather fast. Do you happen to have this test on a file ?
Here is the link where you can find the test. With google translator you can easily read it in your language:

Totalcar - Tesztek - Kér itt valaki enni?

As I heard 1.4 engine consumes a bit less fuel (-0.2-3litre) than the 1.5 does.
As you will read the riporter was the driver (and not the owner) to avoid hypermiller tricks to get better fe. My 2.6L aim is for steady 80km/h.

Better and better FE!
Doni_99
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 05:20 AM   #14 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,745

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HypermilerAX View Post
Good thing is that on these cars everything can be fixed for cheap when you do it yourself.
The good thing about these cars is that almost everything you can do yourself No specialized tools, no need to take apart half of the car to replace a lightbulb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HypermilerAX View Post
Also, for the inspection I removed all the mods. And wow, I saw my consumption rise to 3,3 l (vs 2,8-3,0) although driving very cool like usual.
I didn't imagine I gained that much with the mods since I did them one by one. When you change all at once, you see the difference.
You know you're and ecomodder when...
... You take off all of your mods and still get great fuel consumption.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 11:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Ecomoddically recovering
 
Pandaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 63

Pandamera - '06 Fiat Panda LPG
90 day: 39.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
You know you're and ecomodder when...
... You take off all of your mods and still get great fuel consumption.
You know you're an ecomodder when you are able to convince the technical inspectors they should try this on their cars too!!

Sorry...back on topic, like your AX project BTW. Owned an 89-er 1.1 long time ago myself, following with interest.
__________________
True value for money: tasting your Big Mac again with each belch for 5 days.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 06:19 AM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts


Regarding my future tires, I have made a graph showing FE as a function of different tire sizes. They range from 145 to 185 in width, 55 to 80 in height ratio and 13" to 14" in rim diameter. These are all the sizes I could mount (and that are at least as big as my current tires), not all the ones I consider to mount (I’ll try to avoid 175 and 185 for example).

y : FE in l/100 km
x : tire sizes arranged by diameter, the letter at the end in the rolling resistance class : A is best G is worst. My OEM tires are E, they are all at least as good except one (F). My current tires are on the far-right.

The FE shown is the theoretical FE at 56 mph with as only mod longer 5th gear (estimated gain of 10%). It takes into account the changes in rolling resistance, Cd (width dependent), frontal area (width and diameter dependent) and RPM.
For the Cd, I took the most optimistic figure I found in literature : +0,002 Cd for +10 mm tire width.
For RPM impact, I estimated a 7,5% FE gain for a 10% increase in diameter. While this is probably near to reality for tires that are 0-10% bigger, I imagine that for 20% bigger tires, the gain will be inferior to 15%. So FE for the biggest tires are to take with caution. I won’t be able to mount such tires anyway, I have yet to test with an old 165/70/14 tire what is the maximum I can mount. And then, I’ll make my choice considering the price too.
Also, this is only for changing the front tires. Since I have much more room for bigger tires on the front than on the rear, I’ll keep my original tires on the rear and put bigger tires on the front for lower RPM.
The graph shows that diameter seems to be the main factor in FE change. The ones that are out of the trend are tires that have either particularly bad RR or are very width.
__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km

Last edited by HypermilerAX; 12-29-2012 at 09:14 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HypermilerAX For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (12-27-2012)
Old 12-27-2012, 03:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
People have had very mixed results with increased tyre diameters: it doesn't always work out the way they had hoped ...

I'd take a recent, B rated tyre - the best available at the moment - no matter what size you finally chose.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 12:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
Yes, I think that's what I'm going to do.

To keep you waiting for my future mods, I'll show you the dashboard I have mounted in my car. Originally, the car has a cheap dash with only speed, tank and an analog clock. I have mounted several more gauges taken from high-end Citroën models : revs counter, water temp, oil temp, oil level and oil pressure. The sizing and writing is the same but some adaptations had to be done to make it fit. The wiring has been completely redone. Revs counter is nice, water temp very important to monitor grill block effects, oil temp indicates when the engine is at operating temp. Oil level and pressure are not that crucial.

I forgot to take a pic of the old one but it looks like this :

And this is the new one :

__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km

Last edited by HypermilerAX; 12-30-2012 at 12:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:05 PM   #19 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Just a quick post to say very impressed and to get on the mailing list for updates. The AX is a superb eco motor.

Do you have more pics of the car itself ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:09 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
Do you have more pics of the car itself ?
Right now, no. But for sure, I will post some soon.

__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com