10-20-2008, 01:59 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 356
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
---Backpressure in exhaust; good for city bad for highway!---
What i have been thinking;
Backpressure is good because it increases torque, so that is good for city driving where you need to constantly accelerate and decelerate.
But what about for constant cruising? When you dont need that torque... Wouldn't less backpressure be the best since air would flow out much better?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-20-2008, 02:08 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
Backpressure isn’t good for anything except when used for sound attenuation.
|
|
|
10-20-2008, 02:51 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
|
On a production car, 'back pressure' in the exhaust is factored into the cam timing. The exhaust valves can begin to open earlier than if an open exhaust was used, a benefit at lower engine speeds (i.e. in everyday driving).
|
|
|
10-20-2008, 11:27 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
It's not about back pressure, it's momentum! the exhaust is exiting in pulses not a constant flow, if it was a steady flow then larger would be better, but your engine is not a turbine... and even with a turbine you have to tune your exhaust to keep the momentum to help the engine run better (at least the books on turbine design seem to say so), so what it boils down to is if you believe in physics a properly sized exhaust is going to treat you best, if you are 16 and were given a car, and failed math class then go with a larger exhaust.
|
|
|
10-20-2008, 12:39 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
AeroGuy
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 224
Thanks: 73
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basslover911
Backpressure is good because it increases torque
|
You have some more reading to do...
|
|
|
11-10-2015, 07:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
Exhaust backpressure
Here are a couple of ads for leading high performance mufflers
Both have engineered backpressure into their products for low speed economy,then provided short-circuiting for high speed efficiency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here,YAMAHA (read Ford SVO engine builder) designs it's 'smart' exhaust,with computer-controlled valving to maintain optimum backpressure under all load conditions
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
11-10-2015, 10:32 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
The statements that "back pressure is good" or "an open exhaust is best" are nonsense. To break any theory you take it to the extreme. So if i run 1/2" exhaust pipe i should see an increase in efficiency? How about i just remove the exhaust entirely including the manifolds, will that increase power?
Its been said already, but a PROPERLY SIZED exhaust is what is important. Pressure is only used to suppress noise, notice how many new cars at idle have a, for lack of a better term, throaty exhaust at idle then gets quiet as they accelerate?
__________________
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 12:46 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
On a diesel exhaust back pressure is not helping anything.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 12:50 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907
The statements that "back pressure is good" or "an open exhaust is best" are nonsense. To break any theory you take it to the extreme. So if i run 1/2" exhaust pipe i should see an increase in efficiency? How about i just remove the exhaust entirely including the manifolds, will that increase power?
|
This isn't about extremes, and there is a case for throttled exhaust in engine management.
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 02:52 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Furry Furfag
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
|
My insight is straight piped from the head to the tailpipe (with the exception of the resonator, was way to loud without it). I didn't really notice a difference except at high rpm situations (above 3500rpm). It seems more peppy than it did before. But who knows.
__________________
|
|
|
|