Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2013, 10:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Best teardrop shape proportions for low aero drag?

A raindrop is too general a shape.
Can be too short and wide i.e. those like this
Page 2 The Xara Xone Workbook - Creating Drops of Water

So, What is are the best proportions for aerodynamic purposes?

Are there raindrop proportions better for Kammback use?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-12-2013, 11:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Uh...welcome to ecomodder. Have you looked into the exhaustively discussed aero template in here?

Check it out THIS discussion and it will answer all your questions...get comfortable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 11:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,725
Thanks: 8,154
Thanked 8,936 Times in 7,378 Posts
...or you could search on 'fineness ratio', which describes the number you are looking for.

Essentially 2.5—>4.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 09:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,187
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,809 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
...or you could search on 'fineness ratio', which describes the number you are looking for.

Essentially 2.5—>4.
Yep, from what I recall the aero-shape ratio of width to length of free air verses close proximity to the ground goes from roughly a 1:3 ratio to 1:5 ratio respectively.

Read up on that thread ChazInMT posted, it's a good one.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
proportions

Let's see if I can get something over from Photo-Bucket
You can see the fineness ratio with the lowest Cd.
Hucho puts it at 2.5:1,and in mirror-image ground reflection creates a vehicle body with an 'effective' length-to-height ratio of 5:1 and Cd 0.08.
By adding wheels the Cd goes up to 0.12-0.13.
Wheel fairings can bring that down as with the 1987 GM Sunraycer/1993 HONDA Dream 2.
This is the premise for the Aerodynamic Streamlining Template.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 05-16-2013 at 05:20 PM.. Reason: add text
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
I think that I saw that before. I guess that "filling the wake" still helps, even if we do not maintain attached flow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 07:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
wake

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
I think that I saw that before. I guess that "filling the wake" still helps, even if we do not maintain attached flow.
Yes,it looks like even a compromised aft-body will still provide some drag reducing potential as with Chrysler's experiments with their De Soto Airflow test mule demonstrated.
Their 'fast' rearend helped get the Cd 0.51 of the orig. car down to Cd 0.244.
Not too shabby for 1934!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 09:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,725
Thanks: 8,154
Thanked 8,936 Times in 7,378 Posts
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-18-2013)
Old 05-19-2013, 09:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Thanks a lot guys.

I've never heard of the fineness ratio until now.
A great concept to dig into.

That's why Ecomodder rocks!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com