Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2012, 08:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Boundary layer suction?

What do you guys think about using Boundary Layer Suction to reduce drag?
BLS uses pump to literally suck the drag-creating boundary layer:
Boundary layer suction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What would be the optimal place(s) to place the inlet holes?
Remember that most cars have a huge angles when transitioning from grill to hood to windshield to roof.
So I think the inlet holes would be better placed in over the hood and the roof and in the bellypan. Maybe also on the doors or fenders.

The vacuum pump may be wired so it turns on at certain speeds reducing its power consumption during stop and go traffic.

One patent addressed its use in the underbody:
Patent US20080252099 - Boundary Layer Suction System For A Vehicle - Google Patents

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-05-2012, 08:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
skin drag is pretty small in our world, which is what this addresses.

Form drag is HUGE.

The problem you would solve with this would probably not be measurable.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to drmiller100 For This Useful Post:
some_other_dave (05-07-2012)
Old 05-05-2012, 09:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
And then you'd have to power the pump too as I don't think you could route "suction" from elsewhere to do the job.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 11:52 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
What I recall reading a few years ago is that NASA thought it was a good way to reduce noise.

Some say those silent black helicopters circling overhead use this technology.

Old Thread, see post #8
Fan & Propeller shapes: Sickle and Curved

Quote:
Trailing Edge Blowing blade with top skin removed. Air enters at the retainer (bottom right) and exits through turning vanes at the trailing edge (left).
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 12:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 667 Times in 409 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
And then you'd have to power the pump too as I don't think you could route "suction" from elsewhere to do the job.
Ducted to the low pressure wake behind the vehicle? I don't know if the pressure difference is enough.

Seems like a pretty small gain for a lot of work, though. Do this after you have a full boat tail and a Volt style electric drive system with automatic P&G.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 10:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
skin drag is pretty small in our world, which is what this addresses.

Form drag is HUGE.

The problem you would solve with this would probably not be measurable.
It's not about skin friction.

By sucking out the stationary boundary layer you get less flow separation thus less drag.
In practical terms you get lower drag equivalent to a more aerodynamic shape.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
And then you'd have to power the pump too as I don't think you could route "suction" from elsewhere to do the job.
Beyond certain speed the power required to power the pump is overcompensated by the lower aero drag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 10:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
The drag coefficient is reduced by 20.25% using this strategy
Active Flow Control over the Car
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 10:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The drag is CALCULATED/ESTIMATED to reduce drag that much... while increasing lift about the same amount? We don't want lift.

Quote:
Beyond certain speed the power required to power the pump is overcompensated by the lower aero drag.
What speed is that and how much power does the pump require?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 05:01 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Take a look at Jim Hall's Chapperal cars of the 60's and later his Indy car program. The physics haven't changed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 06:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
suction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big time View Post
What do you guys think about using Boundary Layer Suction to reduce drag?
BLS uses pump to literally suck the drag-creating boundary layer:
Boundary layer suction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What would be the optimal place(s) to place the inlet holes?
Remember that most cars have a huge angles when transitioning from grill to hood to windshield to roof.
So I think the inlet holes would be better placed in over the hood and the roof and in the bellypan. Maybe also on the doors or fenders.

The vacuum pump may be wired so it turns on at certain speeds reducing its power consumption during stop and go traffic.

One patent addressed its use in the underbody:
Patent US20080252099 - Boundary Layer Suction System For A Vehicle - Google Patents
You might want to check in with the folks at Georgia Tech University.I believe they have on-going research with this technology.
The affects of blown and suctioned slots is a mature science now,but for MPGs they haven't conquered the cost factor.So far it's been a net loss energy wise,absorbing more energy than is saved.Like Coanda's airplanes.
The first research in this field was demonstrated by Ludvig Prandtl.He would be your starting point.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com