10-19-2012, 10:06 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada
Posts: 27
FFE - '17 Ford Focus Electric
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
British engineers produce amazing 'petrol from air' technology
Hello,
I thought this news belongs here.
British engineers produce amazing 'petrol from air' technology - Telegraph
Quote:
The technology, presented to a London engineering conference this week, removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
The “petrol from air” technology involves taking sodium hydroxide and mixing it with carbon dioxide before "electrolysing" the sodium carbonate that it produces to form pure carbon dioxide.
Hydrogen is then produced by electrolysing water vapour captured with a dehumidifier.
The company, Air Fuel Synthesis, then uses the carbon dioxide and hydrogen to produce methanol which in turn is passed through a gasoline fuel reactor, creating petrol.
|
and then
Quote:
Company officials say they had produced five litres of petrol in less than three months from a small refinery in Stockton-on-Tees, Teesside.
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:38 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...huh? Our (USA) politicians have been producing "hot air" for eons!
...and, remember, hot air is the energy that makes hot-air balloons "rise & float"!
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 01:27 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
While it's not practical if you just want to burn it in a gasoline engine, I think that their point is that it's possible and instead of taking 50,000,000 years it only took 3 months! and it's being synthesized from air and water, not from more complex base stock.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 01:38 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
I know nothing of the chemistry involved, but it sounds pretty good.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 02:15 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
This definitely belongs in the Unicorn Corral. Just look at the KwH to make a gallon of fuel by their process.
There's a better way going commercial right now in the US. Google Algenol and also Joule Unlimited. These two companies are going to blast corn ethanol right out of the market.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 02:17 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
What's missing : how much energy goes in, and how much comes out ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 02:24 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
and here's the big question:
how much energy was consumed to create these 5 liters of gasoline? the only way this could possibly work out is if the electricity required was generated via water/solar/etc.... not that it would be a bad thing, but it's still not anywhere near as prevalent as it needs to be.
__________________
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 02:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
efficiency = output / input
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 04:13 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
We brits invented the steam engine and the jet engine. That was when we had engineers thinking about stuff in the real world. Now we have greenies thinking in terms of Narnia, so we end up with pish like this.
No way to run an empire is it ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 04:32 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
That's a great point, it takes a ton of energy to produce a gallon of gasoline... so should we find a better way to make gasoline or should we stop using so much of it because it's so hard to make?
Also, energy is energy, so using solar to make gasoline is kind of a dumb idea as well because you will be producing so much waste/heat that it might as well be a heater that has a byproduct of gasoline.
|
|
|
|