Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-15-2017, 05:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Howells Ne
Posts: 126

Supra - '88 Toyota Supra

superhawk - '98 Honda superhawk
Last 3: 27.62 mpg (US)

Lesabre - '96 buick lesabre
3800
90 day: 25.85 mpg (US)

Saturn - '97 Saturn Sc2
Team Saturn
Sports Cars
90 day: 39.12 mpg (US)

Truk - '99 Ford F150
Team Ford
Pickups
90 day: 24.43 mpg (US)

Golf - '03 Vw Golf
90 day: 38.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Brushless fuel pump and fans?

I found a couple interesting articles on dsports website about brushless motors being used in fuel pumps and cooling fans about how they use much less power and last much longer. I thought about how this could apply to the mpg game. The cooling fans might not apply as much but the fuel pumps on cars are always running and what about using brushless motors for the hvac fan?
I know this falls into the splitting hairs category and may be far from cost effective but when going for maximum efficiency it sounds like a good idea...
http://dsportmag.com/the-tech/educat...-fan-solution/
http://dsportmag.com/the-tech/educat...cs-electrical/

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-15-2017, 06:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,771

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,320
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
How much more costly are we talking, on average?

Brushless is discussed often in the RC community, with the same benefits/drawbacks mentioned.

Yesterday I received a brushless RC helicopter and I heard that the brushed version is $5 cheaper.

I'd be willing to pay more upfront for something that will never need maintenance and be a little more efficient. The starter motor for the ATV is always needing new brushes, which is an additional cost in both materials and time.

As a tangent thought, rare earth permanent magnet motors are more efficient than induction (though I don't know by how much). Tesla uses induction, while many other EVs use permanent magnet. Of course, permanent magnet is more costly.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 12:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
Lets see...you can use PWM on brushed motors too, if you're looking to save a bit of power.

And there's no real need to use rare-earth magnets in small-output motors such as these. Your more common/cheaper magnets, like ceramics, will work fine.

I'm not sure how much longer a brushless would last than a brushed motor as a fuel pump. They last one heck of a long time as it is. Without taking a dead one apart, for all we know it could be the bearings that wear out first. You'd probably also want the control circuitry to be separate and easily replaceable, in case it goes before the actual motor does. There is no control circuitry to be concerned about on a brushed motor.

I like the idea. I just don't know if they will last considerably longer or not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 12:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Switching a HVAC motor to brushless has been on my want list for a long time. A suitable R/C motor and controller shouldn't run more than $100.

No more extra heat in the cabin from the resistor, infinitely adjustable speed and a fair bit of power saved.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 12:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
I doubt you'll get enough torque out of an R/C motor. And, as I said, you can get the speed control and power saving with your current motor by running a PWM control to it (and bypassing the resistors).

I paid about $5 for a PWM circuit off ebay that's good up to 90vdc and 15 amps. It's smaller than a deck of cards.

BTW, I think some of the return-less fuel systems are already being controlled by PWM directly from the ECU.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stubby79 For This Useful Post:
mazdamx640 (12-16-2017)
Old 12-16-2017, 04:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Howells Ne
Posts: 126

Supra - '88 Toyota Supra

superhawk - '98 Honda superhawk
Last 3: 27.62 mpg (US)

Lesabre - '96 buick lesabre
3800
90 day: 25.85 mpg (US)

Saturn - '97 Saturn Sc2
Team Saturn
Sports Cars
90 day: 39.12 mpg (US)

Truk - '99 Ford F150
Team Ford
Pickups
90 day: 24.43 mpg (US)

Golf - '03 Vw Golf
90 day: 38.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79 View Post
I doubt you'll get enough torque out of an R/C motor. And, as I said, you can get the speed control and power saving with your current motor by running a PWM control to it (and bypassing the resistors).

I paid about $5 for a PWM circuit off ebay that's good up to 90vdc and 15 amps. It's smaller than a deck of cards.

BTW, I think some of the return-less fuel systems are already being controlled by PWM directly from the ECU.
That sounds like a good idea I might try it with my truck is this like what you were talking about?
https://m.ebay.com/itm/12V-24V-48V-2...4AAOSw0O5aHjCs
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 04:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 726

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 428 Times in 279 Posts
The difference between BLDC and Brushed is about 2 fold mor run time on my RC rock crawler. 30min Vs 2hr on a 5ah 37wh battery.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 11:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79 View Post
BTW, I think some of the return-less fuel systems are already being controlled by PWM directly from the ECU.
True statement. Cooling fans too, I believe. Does a PWM care if the motor is brushed or brushless?

__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com