Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2012, 12:00 PM   #61 (permalink)
Rapturee
 
HHOTDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern Idaho...way up north!
Posts: 254

Sippy2 - '15 Honda NC700XD DCT
90 day: 59.51 mpg (US)

Shorty - '02 Ford F150 XL
Thanks: 885
Thanked 70 Times in 47 Posts
Very good info Sendler, thanks. I live in a rural area that does not require any emissions testing still and I am wondering if that is why I didn't need any of that when I titled/reg my last vehicles from there..? I will make a trip down to our DMV and see what they are saying to confirm. I don't want to raise any eye brows that are not needed you know. :{)

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-11-2012, 12:44 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
V-Matic trans vs gears?

I asked this a while back but didn't get any answer. In choosing a donor bike for a full streamliner conversion, what is the overall efficiency of a V-Matic scooter transmission versus gears. How long do the belts and drives last? I have read on the scooter forums that these CVT transmissions can wear out the belt and groove/ put sticky spots in both pulley assemblies every 5,000 miles. The Honda SH150i would make a good starting point if they weren't so expensive as they have a fuel injected 15hp single, 53 inch wheelbase and 16 inch wheels. And a nice combined ABS system.
.
2010 SH150i Specifications - Honda Powersports
.
.
.
.

Last edited by sendler; 02-11-2012 at 01:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 12:55 PM   #63 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
My experience is with snowmobile and atv cvts, and their efficiencies are quite a bit lower than gears.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 01:13 PM   #64 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
My experience is with snowmobile and atv cvts, and their efficiencies are quite a bit lower than gears.
Loss in the belt or from ineffective rpm tuning?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 01:40 PM   #65 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The belt needs to be squeezed very hard and transfers power solely via friction.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 01:46 PM   #66 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 96
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Generally speaking, CVT trans eats more power than a geared trans. In the ballpark of the best CVT is maybe as good as the worst manual as far as efficiency. True, there is a black art to tuning a CVT. The advantage of a CVT is; tuned correctly it allows the motor to run at the best motor efficiency. YMMV with application of the 2 types of trans.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 05:29 PM   #67 (permalink)
A Legend in his Own Mind
 
Ken Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 281
Thanks: 52
Thanked 91 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
I asked this a while back but didn't get any answer. In choosing a donor bike for a full streamliner conversion, what is the overall efficiency of a V-Matic scooter transmission versus gears. How long do the belts and drives last? I have read on the scooter forums that these CVT transmissions can wear out the belt and groove/ put sticky spots in both pulley assemblies every 5,000 miles. .
.
These vbelt cvt's (the v-belt stage) can be 96% efficient, with some manufacturers claiming even a little higher. The same is true of any v-belt drive, if properly tensioned. (Gates, I think uses 97%, maybe.) The CVTs are self-tensioning, so the effective ratio changes (minutely) with a stretched belt, but the tension does not. Different systems have different numbers of gear meshes before and/or after the CVT. 98% for each mesh is a reasonable estimate.

At very low speeds, when the drive is not fully engaged (which happens in different ways with different scooters (some have independent centrifugal clutches, some use the v-belt drive unit) efficiency is awful.

If your streamliner is for you own use, and not for a competition, then the packaging ease and compactness of the scooter motor transmission unit is appealing, and may outweigh efficiency concerns . If you want, you can be seated over the front of the motor, while still having a low seat height.

Disadvantages include the difficulty in changing final drive ratios, and maybe 5% overall lower efficiency -- but that's assuming identical engine efficiency: the 150 is apt to be more efficient at 10 hp than a 250 cc bike at 10 hp. Honda has been publishing fuel economy numbers, which I think are reliable for comparing Honda models against one another. The 91 mpg quoted is pretty impressive as compared to the CBR 250's 77 -- which is a very efficient 250.

Some of the larger scooters have very high priced belts in the name of efficiency (they bend more like a chain). One I checked was about $250 or so.. or maybe $350... a lot in any case.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ken Fry For This Useful Post:
sendler (02-11-2012)
Old 02-11-2012, 05:58 PM   #68 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
96% efficiency is actually a pretty reasonably small amount of loss which could even be made up by fine tuning the pulley weights to keep the engine right in the sweet part of the power band. A case full of constant meshed gears slinging lube might not be much better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 06:33 AM   #69 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
96 is about 8 better than any figure I've ever seen for CVTs. Must be a scooter unit with a much more pliable belt and lower pinch pressures.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2012, 10:20 AM   #70 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
It's hard to find much on scooter CVT efficiency. I found an article on the Honda S-Matic variable transmission which shows a chart for belt slip. Does this give an almost complete view of the losses?
.
Honda Worldwide | Technology Close-up
.
.
.
.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	CVT slip rate.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	48.7 KB
ID:	10261  
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com