Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-09-2014, 12:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 54
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Buying help - 2005 Hybrid or 2014 Accord?

I want a V6 Accord, but of course want the highest MPG for my highway commute. I've narrowed it down to:

2005 Accord Hybrid 3.0 VCM engine (EPA rated 33 mpg highway)
2014 Accord 3.5 with VCM engine (EPA rated 34 mpg highway)
2014 Accord 3.5 with manual shift (EPA rated 28 highway)

Typically a smaller engine gives better efficiency when hypermiling, but the EPA results show the opposite. I suspect it's the older car's 5-speed transmission that gives it lower economy.

Which V6 would you buy?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-09-2014, 06:12 AM   #2 (permalink)
0.29 Cd and decreasing
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 184

Red Rocket - '90 honda CRX HF
Team Honda
Team "Old SKOOL"
90 day: 53.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
honestly, neither. If you're looking to get better mpg's I'd go with a 4 cylinder, why do you need a V6? I'm sure the 4 cylinders are peppy enough. Unless there are other reasons why you may need the V6
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tvbd56 For This Useful Post:
theaveng (08-09-2014)
Old 08-09-2014, 08:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
If you have to have a V6, probably the 2014 automatic. If you pulse and glide the manual though you might end up with better fuel economy.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
theaveng (08-09-2014)
Old 08-09-2014, 10:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 54
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvbd56 View Post
I'd go with a 4 cylinder, why do you need a V6?
I already have two I4 and I3.... I want to go back to a V6 with the three cylinder mode..... also this engine has won Wards magazine for eight years (best economy & smoothness)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 11:53 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
Id just wait for the new car as honda is suppose to have 3 new direct injected turbo charged power plants and a new hybrid system for 2015.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 01:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 54
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
DI is a bad idea, because the fuel doesn't wash the air inlet valves (which clot & stop working properly). Also Wards Auto already reviewed the DI V6 and said it wasn't as good as the PI engine.

Last edited by theaveng; 08-09-2014 at 02:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 11:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 54
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
If you have to have a V6, probably the 2014 automatic. If you pulse and glide the manual though you might end up with better fuel economy.
So far you are the only 1 to answer the original question. So you think manual will do better than automatic, even though there's a 6 highway mpg gap?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2014, 12:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theaveng View Post
So far you are the only 1 to answer the original question. So you think manual will do better than automatic, even though there's a 6 highway mpg gap?
I think the reason the manual has a lower rating is due to gearing differences, the thing is, for gearing to effect mileage you actually have to be in gear haha. If your doing most of your commute freeway or other areas where pulse and gliding isn't an option, then get the auto with Taller gears.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2014, 01:40 AM   #9 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
If you consider EOC, that is only an option with a manual, although everybody says to read the owner's manual regarding towing.

As Balto wrote, automatics have better gearing than manuals. Manuals should be more efficient, but they are also quicker, so they make them sportier at the cost of efficiency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2014, 01:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
Not sure about the availability of different gear sets to make its manual transmission more suitable to highway driving, but a V6 with a manual sounds cool...

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com