Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-16-2013, 07:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 128
Thanks: 14
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Can front air dam hurt mpg

I attached some black landscape
Trim below the front trim under the bumper. Is there any chance I
I would improve mpg by letting the air go under the car? Yes or no. Sc

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-16-2013, 08:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
The Dirty330 Modder
 
Gealii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North East Ohio, USA
Posts: 642

CruzeRS - '15 Chevy Cruze LT RS
90 day: 41.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 67 Times in 59 Posts
if not installed properly yes and air dam can hurt mpg. now improper installment can range from being the height of the air dam is to tall, the air dam is to far back, the list goes on.
__________________



"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing."
- Henry Ford
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 01:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,701

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,276
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
The purpose of an airdam is to keep the car's aerodynamically dirty underside (and front tires) out of the airstream, increasing frontal area to reduce Cd. So if the airdam is taller than needed then you will be wasting energy to push air.

If the underside is already smooth then an airdam will hurt CdA. Wheel spats would be enough in that case.

A-B-A-B testing will answer the OP's question.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 06:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 128
Thanks: 14
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Ok since it's a Volvo station wagon 1994, I reckon it is helping. Abab testing is not going to work since the speedo odo. Stops working now and then. Damimg the air flow under the front bumper does not make as much sense in my brain has the front grill block does. Sc
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:08 AM   #5 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
I agree an air dam could hurt MPG. In free flight a streamline body has nominal low Cd. In ground proximity its Cd goes up substantially. If a chin spoiler adds frontal area then unless it somehow reduces Cd enough to compensate then it seems reasonable to expect CdA to increase. To my mind just cleaning up under belly seems more likely to improve Cd and Cda. Just my 2c...
__________________
Recreation Engineer

Last edited by KamperBob; 04-17-2013 at 08:08 AM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 128
Thanks: 14
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Here is a front Picture, I lowered the front dam 3-4 inches. SC
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	front  volvo0512121530-00.jpg
Views:	576
Size:	145.2 KB
ID:	12916  
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmellyCat View Post
........Abab testing is not going to work since the speedo odo. Stops working now and then. .........
One major benefit on the two trucks and one car I have installed front air dams (chin spoilers) to is the decreased buffeting during heavy cross winds on the highway.

I believe in all three cases hwy mph went up about 1.5 mph.

However, there are several reported cases in the forum of decreased mpg with the use of large chin spoilers/air-dams.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 07:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts


This is the 1st attempt and measurement on my car it is now only 1/4" bellow the cross member. Don't go any lower than where you determine the most of you drag to be coming from. So take a look, determine how much is if any thing is below your factory dam and adjust accordingly.
You may have noticed that some of the factory dams are higher in the middle, I believe this is two fold one to keep the frontal area as small a possible and still redirecting the air flow around lower hanging components.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com