Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2010, 11:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
epic stock master
 
luvit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377

86 Accord LX (carb) - '86 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 35.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
daverbmxer,
i opened a thread with the same question. -- i already had my VAC gauge installed.
i did find conditions, like a highway on-ramp, where the lower gear yielded better vacuum.
i have an automatic transmission, so lugging is pretty unlikely to happen, but i come close.

the only reasonable response i received was old tele man's response.

my vehicle is too old for a scanguage to compare these gears, but i think he made great sense.

__________________
.
single person car thread
.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-01-2010, 07:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Luvit - You could install a marine fuel meter, such as a flowscan, to determine GPH usage of the engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 08:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
epic stock master
 
luvit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: US
Posts: 377

86 Accord LX (carb) - '86 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 35.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
what do i do with that GPH figure? ..kinda see GPH in either gear?
__________________
.
single person car thread
.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 08:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
One Cold North Dakotan
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 7

Sammy - '88 Suzuki Samurai JX
90 day: 21.41 mpg (US)

Doc - '91 Suzuki DR350S S
90 day: 48.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Those can't be cheap..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 09:26 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
If you know GPH and MPH, you can compute MPG. They aren't overly cheap, about $150 for an analog gauge type, more for digital display. For a carb, however ,there isn't much other choice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 09:52 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 10

Duff-stiva - '93 Ford Festiva Trio
90 day: 42.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
When cruising in 4th or 5th gear even with identical throttle positions you are sucking more air through at higher rpm which mean more fuel as well.
Here is the answer
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 01:34 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
A tall velocity stack on the carb perhaps?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 02:01 AM   #18 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
When I first got my Scangauge, that was the first test I did - a 4th, 5th, and 6th gear mpg comparison drive at the same 35 mph speed on a slight uphill climb about a mile long. The mpg results showed 5th gear beat 4th, and 6th gear beat 5th. This was in my SE-R.

Here's another. I've run the same 10 mile loop in all three of my family's cars in top gear and the next gear down. That's 35 mph in top gear v. 30 mph in the next lower gear. The route is essentially level, driving at sea level with at most about a 50' elevation gain in a couple of places. Each car showed better mpg in top gear.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg

Last edited by SentraSE-R; 03-03-2010 at 02:09 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 09:35 AM   #19 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...the ecomodder jingle, repeat after me:

"the slowest RPM in the highest GEAR that doesn't 'lug' the engine."

"the slowest RPM in the highest GEAR that doesn't 'lug' the engine."

"the slowest RPM in the highest GEAR that doesn't 'lug' the engine."
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 04:07 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Old Tele man is right. That's why low end torque is good. It allows you to run in a higher gear in a lot of situations.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-split ductless question.. Xringer Saving@Home 50 05-25-2010 05:01 PM
Tires question RandomFact314 EcoModding Central 18 04-20-2009 12:30 PM
Prius Question Matt Herring EcoModding Central 13 07-24-2008 04:07 PM
Question regarding Scangauge MPG readout & DIY device Gregte DIY / How-to 5 05-19-2008 05:58 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com