04-22-2012, 09:03 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 298
Thanked 122 Times in 88 Posts
|
Care to guess CD factor?
I just wanted some opinions on what you think the CD drag factor would be on the Lola T70, and, or replicas. (just this coupe body) 
__________________
06 Chev MonteC JG#24tribute car 30mpg 00 Honda Insight 63MPG 98 Buick Park Ave3.8 33MPG 89 Toyota Corolla wag 60MPG so far 81 VW Rabbit diesel pu 50MPG+ 80 Mercedes 240D stick 30-ish 90 vette 6-speed,29ish 07 Honda ST1300 55MPG 83 Honda 650 GL 64MPG 19 Suzuki dr200 88MPG23 HondaGrom?+Tow K10D Sub 26mpg NEVER,NEVER GIVE UP!
PUMP THOSE TIRES UP!
DRIVE IN YOUR SOCKS FOR SENSITIVITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SLOW DOWN AND SMOOTH UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![[SIGPIC]](https://ecomodder.com/forum/avatars/larrybuck.gif?type=sigpic&dateline=1329099184)
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 09:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Windsor ON Canada
Posts: 373
Thanks: 21
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
|
.5 due to downforce?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-22-2012, 09:41 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hot, Windy and Freezing Southern Plains
Posts: 23
Thanks: 197
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
|
That
or worse. The first Porsche 930 turbo Carrera (whale tail) generated around 750 lbs. of downforce at 120 mph. The above has much more front and rear down force square footage.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 12:26 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
the vast majority of drag is usually in the back of the car.
The back of that car is HORRIBLE for drag - they were after downforce for the back of teh car at any cost of drag as horsepower was basically unlimited in that era.
Most racing cars are REALLY after grip - and grip is FREE with downforce.
You need to look at bonneville cars for inspiration.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 02:16 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRU
.5 due to downforce?
|
At least 0.5, probably a lot higher. But minimal frontal area.
You could put in a little diesel engine and a 50 MPG sticker on the back, and watch the car nuts go berserk.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 07:28 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
|
Lola
I would guess it at over 0.60.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 07:48 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
I see a lot of potential in that car though.
The rear swings up . Just remove it and build a fiberglass extension for it.
This would not only help aerodynamics, but rear visibility as well.
Stock, the visibility was horrendous .
A boattail just like the one on the Olds Aerotech would look right at home.
No odd stares either. Thumbs would go up.
I've always loved the look of the Lola.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 07:53 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
YKYAEM when you admire that car for its windshield instead of the engine.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 08:04 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Gulf-Mirage 1967 To 1982 - Ed McDonough - Google Books
This source gives the car a Cd of .395
I seem to remember reading the current generation GT-40 was tweaked down to .36 if memory serves me right.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-23-2012, 09:43 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 134
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
The book Competition Car Aerodynamics puts full blown Formula 1 cars at between .7-1.1CD depending on what track they were set up for. The books forward was written by a Formula 1 aero engineer whos been working in F1 for 20 years.
I would guess .5, but i could believe it being what cd listed above.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
