01-06-2010, 04:17 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
In persuit of Efficiency
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gainesville Florida
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Catalytic Converter Bypass Valve
Has anyone out there thought about bypassing the catalytic converter after the car has warmed up. How much power and milage gain would potentially be gained from bypassing it.
I did a quick sketch of possible bypass system with a shutoff valve. It seems to me it would be fairly easy to implement. The operator will be responsible for turning the system ON and OFF
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2010, 04:25 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
|
You wouldn't gain anything. Modern cats really aren't restrictions.
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2010, 06:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 507
Thanks: 111
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
It also wouldn't be an "EcoMod"
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-06-2010, 11:14 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EV OR DIESEL
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
|
I'm with everyone on this, But I can tell you that I have been around a few Ferraris that did exactly what you are talking about.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dremd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-06-2010, 11:39 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
|
Yep I have to agree about modern cats being efficient.
Bypassing them would result in virtually zero gain for either performance or fuel savings.
Just my 2c worth , Pete.
Last edited by Peter7307; 01-06-2010 at 11:45 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2010, 01:19 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Seems bass-ackwards on several levels.
For one, the cat doesn't work very well when it's cold. So you're going to run gases through it when it doesn't work, then when it's warm enough to work you bypass it??? I'd say with that logic just tear it out... but as noted, the cat isn't the biggest restriction and even if it was, tearing it out doesn't help fe.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-07-2010, 02:17 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362
Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic 90 day: 25.89 mpg (US) Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E 90 day: 37.07 mpg (US) Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US) Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
if you take it out it will gain 5.3 HP on a dyno on a 1985 Ferrari 308 GTS quattrovalve Not that i would know 
Just winds up giving you more throttle response but not very good eco wise
__________________
Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2010, 07:15 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
I can see how this could help at 7k rpm at WOT, but cruising along at 1700 rpm? Gains would be slim to none, and surely not noticeable. Plus it's totally illegal on roads.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tasdrouille For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-07-2010, 11:28 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362
Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic 90 day: 25.89 mpg (US) Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E 90 day: 37.07 mpg (US) Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US) Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille
I can see how this could help at 7k rpm at WOT, but cruising along at 1700 rpm? Gains would be slim to none, and surely not noticeable. Plus it's totally illegal on roads.
|
Well not places that don't have emissions laws
__________________
Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2010, 11:35 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
|
Hes in the US, you need a CAT to be legal.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
[/url]
