Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2008, 11:04 PM   #41 (permalink)
MP$
 
diesel_john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 595
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to diesel_john
Which is more efficient more cylinders or less cylinders?


Last edited by diesel_john; 05-26-2008 at 04:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-15-2008, 02:36 AM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Even w/ diesels, efficiency depends on BSFC compared to gearing, although I imagine fewer cylinders with more displacement would be better compared to the same with more cylinders. I've noticed for my Rabbit, if I drop down in around 40mph cruising the loss in load and increase in BSFC mostly make up for the decrease in energy needed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 02:41 AM   #43 (permalink)
Eco-Nerd
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DJ,

Less cylinders inline is the most efficient in my opinion per equal displacement. There are less frictional losses.

No angular torque loss & less rotating mass than a V design. The V design exists for easier packaging in a chassis than an inline engine. Less valvetrain complexity, weight & cost.

Notice how GM went back to all-new inline 5cyl & 6cyl engines in the Trailblazer & Colorado?

That is my two cents.

Cowspots
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:25 AM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wichita
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So a 3.0L 3-cyl diesel would be optimum (or close to it) for a minivan?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:42 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Depends on the choice of gearboxes and possibly differentials. Too small an engine might have to rev too high, which could hurt efficiency. Too large an engine and it could be at too low of a load...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 01:45 AM   #46 (permalink)
Eco-Nerd
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
3L 3Cyl Diesel??

Apgrok1,

No 3L 3-Cyl Diesel exists to my knowledge. There are 3L 4-Cyl Common Rail Diesel FORD Rangers in Taiwan. VW had the cast iron and more desirably the aluminum block Lupo 1.2L TDI in Germany and the UK.

FYI: The Lupo was the most economical ICE (internal combustion engine) production car ever produced at 78 US mpg which ended production in 2005. It used so little fuel that it had to have an axillary electric heater just to keep passengers warm. Heck, I'd be all warm inside knowing I was getting 78 mpg! WHY? WHY? WHY did VW kill it? Just when we need it the most? NOx emissions standards, I would guess.

Just like the GM Electric car. DEAD! The manufacturers killed them off!

Conspiracy theories abound! Time for my meds!

Goodnight,
Cowspots
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 02:37 AM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
we had a 3 cyl diesel generator at out shop way back when..
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 07:40 AM   #48 (permalink)
MP$
 
diesel_john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 595
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to diesel_john
Smile

3 cylinder 3.3L

http://www.tractordata.com/td/td612.html


3 cylinder 854cc
http://www.deere.com/en_GB/products/.../hpx_specs.pdf

Last edited by diesel_john; 05-26-2008 at 04:01 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 01:50 AM   #49 (permalink)
Eco-Nerd
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KY
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Diesel Surprise!

Thanks DJ,
WOW! I'm surprised to see that there was a 3.3L 3-Cyl engine produced in a US market tractor.
I wonder what the dimensions and weight are of this engine? I'll bet it's tall, very heavy & low RPM.
It's a shame it wouldn't be practical for any little econocar project.
I was seriously tempted to put an '83 GM 4.3L diesel into an '79 El Camino this week, but I just couldn't justify the cost of doing it. The seller of the Olds couldn't verify the drivetrain was good or even send me better pics.
I think that a '93 GM 6.5L TD running BIO-D/WVO in a 95+ Camaro with 6-speed & 2.73 F/D would be fantastic!

G-Night!
Cowspots
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 02:01 AM   #50 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
why not an isuzi 4 cyl diesel in an el camino?

that would be a nice little saver? or a mitsubishi turbo diesel out of a mini truck..

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
News: Smart testing a 70 mpg diesel in the US in 2nd gen car MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 4 07-02-2009 12:51 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com