06-20-2012, 11:20 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mars
Posts: 106
Diabla - '09 Renault Laguna Hatchback
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
Crime does not pay - at least not when speeding:)
So, I had a 90km each way trip today and about 70km of that was highway with neglible sea level difference.
Felt in a very scientific mood, so I did an A-B test on the highway.
A: Driving up to 170km/h where safely possible on the open road and up to 130km/h in the tunnels while keeping at least a 2 second distance behind the vehicles upfront. Tried to use as little brakes as possible, but still had to brake a lot due to lane changers who forget their turn signal before they go on the speeding lane.
Result: average speed of 123km/h and a fuel consumption of 7.2litres/100km.
B: Driving up to 140km/h on the open road and 110km/h in the tunnels.
Result: average speed of 114km/h and a fuel consumption of 5.2litres/100km.
The car was a Renault Laguna 1.5dCi with A/C on all the time and the stereo blasting Helix through 9 speakers
I didn`t expect a big difference in average speed or the fuel economy, but going only 8% faster for 38% more fuel has been a hit in the face. Not to mention driving slower has yet again proved to be more relaxing because I almost never had to use the brakes.
So, speeding does save time on an empty road, but in average traffic conditions it is only up to a certain point that you are rationally saving time, beyond that it is only a hazard and a big no no for both your wallet and your nerves 
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lowglider For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-20-2012, 01:09 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowglider
So, speeding does save time on an empty road, but in average traffic conditions it is only up to a certain point that you are rationally saving time, beyond that it is only a hazard and a big no no for both your wallet and your nerves 
|
Good point. You slowed down by 30 KPH (18%) , but your average speed dropped only 9 KPH (7%). The additional travel time was only 3.5 minutes.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
06-20-2012, 03:27 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
Well when you double your speed, the horse power required to maintain that speed goes up by a factor of about 8.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
06-21-2012, 09:12 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Yupp, at least not if you are the lead vehicle. Ive found if you draft it doesnt hurt as bad, but its better to coast than brake for mpg and if you got a hybrid, to charge its pack.
I found it interesting that over all my tank average dips by 5 when I choose to go 55mph vs keeping up with traffic. 
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 02:04 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Well when you double your speed, the horse power required to maintain that speed goes up by a factor of about 8.
|
I think it's a factor of 4, but it certainly is a lot.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 10:32 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
I think it's a factor of 4, but it certainly is a lot.
|
The drag force is a second order equation, i.e. double the speed and the drag force is 4 times greater. However, doubling the speed also doubles the rate at with the force is applied, hence, 8 times the power.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 01:04 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Thanks, I did not know that.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave
The drag force is a second order equation, i.e. double the speed and the drag force is 4 times greater. However, doubling the speed also doubles the rate at with the force is applied, hence, 8 times the power.
|
This is driving force behind the reason a car with roughly 100 horse power with the proper gearing like a 5-speed neon can top out at about 100mph, but it takes a nextel cup car with its roughly 800hp engine to go hit a top speed of some where around 200mph.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
06-23-2012, 12:13 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
I concur with the OP. High speed data below are based on 100+ mile drives with cruise control set. 35 mph data are short drive numbers for comparison.

__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Last edited by SentraSE-R; 06-23-2012 at 12:18 AM..
|
|
|
|