Out of all the various forums I posted this question on, you guys are the only ones with intelligent responses. Most others just post stupid insults.
We used to have a carbureted '87 CRX, with the aluminum rear drums & superlight wheels, rated 57 mgp highway. We even ran it successfully on 2 cylinders, but it was a real slug.
Now, I'm setting up another CRX to run on 2 cylinders, but have the 2 center cylinders supercharge the outside cylinders (welding/grinding cam required). Fuel injection will be a vast improvement over the previous one with motorcycle carbs.
The idea of springs is on the right track, but there's no feedback/control to compensate for wear. Too much space will mandate pumping the brakes before they grip. Small springs would be a viable option for short term events. Most of us don't remember that the old mechanical brakes had to be adjusted constantly, so an adjustable spring idea is a viable option for only the most conscientious car owner. Maybe someday Japan will come out with an electric (electro hydraulic even) servo system to clear the pads from the disc, or even incorporate that into the ABS hardware that exists.
When I converted our '50 MG to front disc brakes, a proportioning & compensating valve was a pretty important addition, otherwise, the mismatched behavior between discs/drums leads to spinouts. The fact that disc drag and drum brakes don't is why the compensator valving was developed, to hold the calipers back until the shoes provide resistance. For a car with 4 drum brakes, no proportioning valve is needed.
Last edited by jrnsr; 10-19-2011 at 01:21 PM..
Reason: misspelling
|