Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-09-2014, 10:21 PM   #81 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Low CR = low efficiency.

Low rpm isn't magic- most low rpm engines are really long stroke so the piston speed ends up comparable to high rpm, short stroke engines.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
yoyoyoda (03-09-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-09-2014, 10:25 PM   #82 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: NSW, Aus
Posts: 116
Thanks: 61
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Low CR = low efficiency.

Low rpm isn't magic- most low rpm engines are really long stroke so the piston speed ends up comparable to high rpm, short stroke engines.
Yep. and never said it was magic.

The problem however with doing a stroker engine is that then you have additional torque which the transmission can barely handle, so you then get spinning tyres at low speed which lose traction, and you guessed it, continue to spin.

Its not a very high RPM that the wheels are spinning at, its just slipping like crazy because of the additional torque. Which can probably be fixed by increasing the diameter of the wheels, to very large ones.

Thats what I've heard happens anyway.

Increasing the mass of the flywheel can then be used to counteract the lack of a power stroke during the times that cylinders 3 and 4 would be firing.

A definitely tempting modification to do, but on a carburetted engine its a lot easier to do.

Last edited by yoyoyoda; 03-09-2014 at 10:30 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 10:30 PM   #83 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well then what was that artificial 1200 rpm redline all about?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cobb (03-10-2014)
Old 03-09-2014, 10:32 PM   #84 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: NSW, Aus
Posts: 116
Thanks: 61
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Well then what was that artificial 1200 rpm redline all about?
I would ideally like to see all engines kept under 1,200 rpm for longevity reasons alone. The longer you can keep a car and its engine the better it is for the environment.

A car that lasts the rest of your life would be nice in my book. Just get a new body every few years if people are fussy, one made from biodegradable plastics or hemp.

If people manage to do this anyway, add on a heftier flywheel, drop a cylinder or two, then car engines can double as stationary engines for use on an offgrid power system once we're done with them on the roads, or just plain make it dual use.

Adjusting the compression ratio would then enable use of 5+ year old petrol and/or 100% ethanol.

There are quite a few uses of old engines actually:
http://www.mtfca.com/discus/messages...tml?1199713339

Last edited by yoyoyoda; 03-09-2014 at 10:41 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 10:44 PM   #85 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
And that number came from where?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cobb (03-10-2014)
Old 03-09-2014, 10:49 PM   #86 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: NSW, Aus
Posts: 116
Thanks: 61
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
And that number came from where?
You are very intimidating so I'm just going to stop talking to you.

But fyi it came from my head.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 07:40 AM   #87 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyoyoda View Post
Other traffic is what prevents me from driving at <40km/h speeds (25mph), I've been known to even tell my neighbours that I want the residential speed limit reduced to 25-30km/h.
Driving too slow can be as ineffcient as driving too fast. You need high as possible road speed for the slowest possible engine speed. With the current residential limit of 50km/h, none of my cars are really happy in top gear. It's also too slow for DFCO to kick in for many vehicles (eg my Van 60km/h [2000rpm] in fifth, the Jeep needs about 100km/h [2000rpm] to DFCO in sixth).

My Fiat is already a 2 cylinder :P

Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 03-10-2014 at 10:58 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 06:42 PM   #88 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
I hate to break it to you yoda, but the honda and toyota hybrids use the valve timing technology to delay closing of the intake valve to reduce the displacement and cr for increased efficiency by reducing pumping losses. They also switch over to a more normal mode for power, warming up faster and as needed. Honda retains the power mode in its hybrid civic. The redline is reduced in these cars vs what you see in the si, type r, etc.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pulse and Glide Fuel Economy Calculator 4 valve / Cylinder newtonsfirstlaw DIY / How-to 25 11-04-2008 03:32 PM
How Many Automatics out There? (FE techniques discussion) RH77 EcoModding Central 18 02-07-2008 10:50 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com