Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-22-2013, 02:33 PM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville Ill.
Posts: 101

sizematters - '08 smart 4-2 passion cabrio
90 day: 51.99 mpg (US)

escape - '06 Ford Escape xlt
90 day: 26.78 mpg (US)

Buick - '04 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 27.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 209
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
I finally got around to making the side skirts out of a vinyl gutter, it took less than an hour to do (minus paint drying time), 1 vinyl gutter, 1 can of spray paint and 12 screws. I'm still testing and it looks very promising, more stable in wind and mileage seems to improve but the weather hasn't cooperated lately (colder). I'm still getting better mileage in cold weather than I did before installation but I'm not done testing. Chumly

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-26-2013, 09:04 AM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 35
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 12 Posts
Good looking mods I tried an air dam - splitter. It did harm for my mpg. Maybe it was the splitter bit. However I have a full belly pan and a boat tail. So it might be that air underneath the car does not do that much damage but the increased frontal area does.

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 09:40 AM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitroX View Post
Good looking mods I tried an air dam - splitter. It did harm for my mpg. Maybe it was the splitter bit. However I have a full belly pan and a boat tail. So it might be that air underneath the car does not do that much damage but the increased frontal area does.
Don't drop the air dam lower than your belly pan.

Remove the splitter
It so pronounced (about 5cm , 2" ?) that it causes extra downforce = extra rolling resistance = extra drag
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
beluga (01-01-2014)
Old 11-26-2013, 10:18 AM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 35
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 12 Posts
It is long gone. I expected that the results would be negative on the mpg, but this ford rs splitter was lying around so had to try it . The down force was somewhat noticeable and the car felt more stable though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2013, 08:30 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
Did you try a full upper grill block and a partial lower grill block?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2013, 07:29 AM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 35
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 12 Posts
Yes. I've tried a number of combinations (cooling fan is operated by a switch by the way). This engine cools very well even without the fan so i do not need to use it, but blocking too much decreased the mpg dramatically, on some runs I even had as low as 34 (normally getting about 49). So by trial and error I ended up blocking about 50% of the bumper and hud grill. The gains seem to be under 2%.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2013, 02:05 PM   #37 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 5

chips geo - '91 Geo Metro
90 day: 47.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Great inventive use of materials.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 09:47 PM   #38 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chumly View Post
I just made an air dam out of some lawn edging. A B A testing shows 3.16%-4.2 % (avg 3.73%) better mileage. It took a whole half hour to make and install it, I should have done this a long time ago! Chumly
I am curious as to how you fastened your wheel covers on the wheels. Did you bolt them on, with washers holding the bolts in place?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ausias View Post
the airdam is a very good invention. IT works very good in my car. But I'm using a 45º airdam.
I am not following the 45º air dam idea? Is it angled forwards at 45º to the road surface?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 09:53 PM   #39 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CitroX View Post
It is long gone. I expected that the results would be negative on the mpg, but this ford rs splitter was lying around so had to try it . The down force was somewhat noticeable and the car felt more stable though.
Curious results. I have a home-brew splitter on my truck, and it honestly seems to help. (No formal A-B-A tests, but some back to back drives to work) It protrudes about the same amount (5cm), but is mounted directly under the factory plastic air dam. I did try to extend one down about 2 inches lower before, and that was detrimental. The splitter with a set of belly panels seems to do pretty good...
So I wonder now, if your belly panels had been level with the splitter how things would have tested....
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2013, 04:30 AM   #40 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 35
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 12 Posts
Look a few posts above which explain why the mpg dropped on my car . And if the belly would be as low as the splitter the car would be undriveable.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com