Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-26-2015, 04:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
Aftermarket filters K&N or Simota?

Anyone rate these K&N filters or are you just paying for the name? Here a K&N cost 6 times more than the Simota. I am not worried about the re usable or washable or those gimmicks. I just wan to know which one wil give me better increase in power? I keep having to gear down to climb some long hills around where I stay and it really hurts my FE. There are other things u can do to improve my FE but I want to start here.

__________________



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-26-2015, 05:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 3

Meganator - '99 Renault Megane Hatchback
90 day: 38.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
There is a test report on metrompg.com. Seems like there isn't much to gain with a performance filter.

Just google metrompg air filter.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mapky For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015), mcrews (12-18-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 06:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,634

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 703 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Mighty Car Mods - POD Filters Mythbusted: http://youtu.be/PAIxeQUSg-Q
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015), mcrews (12-18-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 07:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Don't waste your money. Just get OEM style paper filters and be happy.
Air Filtration Test
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
digital rules (02-27-2015), Eddie25 (02-27-2015), mcrews (12-18-2015), Mustang Dave (03-21-2015), user removed (02-26-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 09:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Mighty Car Mods - POD Filters Mythbusted: Mighty Car Mods - POD Filters Mythbusted - YouTube
I wonder if stock air box with normal filter and smooth piping makes a difference? Also the air box had a definitive advantage in both tests in that video, it was pulling COOL air from the wheel well (or the front in the 1.3L). I still don't think CAI are worth the 120-200$,but I thought I would point that out. I think it's why they lost power on the subraru on the Second run, the engine bay got hot.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015), mcrews (12-18-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 09:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
But many systems are CAI-type from the start (my Celica has the intake pipe in the front)

Some cars with variable intake systems do not like to have a aftermarket filter. It has something to do with air resonance.
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fingie For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 09:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingie View Post
But many systems are CAI-type from the start (my Celica has the intake pipe in the front)

Some cars with variable intake systems do not like to have a aftermarket filter. It has something to do with air resonance.
I mean, they did design it specifically to that filter type. I am still curious about the smooth piping though.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015)
Old 02-27-2015, 01:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingie View Post
But many systems are CAI-type from the start (my Celica has the intake pipe in the front)

Some cars with variable intake systems do not like to have a aftermarket filter. It has something to do with air resonance.
I can believe that. The resonator chambers attached to the stock intake tubes are designed to provide a boost when the cams or intake runners change over... changing the air velocity or air flow ruins the effect. You typically have to design an aftermarket tube to go with the filter to smoothen it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Mighty Car Mods - POD Filters Mythbusted: http://youtu.be/PAIxeQUSg-Q
They tested one car with an unspecified "expensive" filter, and the other one was chipped.

When a car is chipped, you've got to retune it for whatever mods are made.

On older circa-90's cars, you could actually gain power from a simple filter swap, but the effects vary so much from car to car that you can't draw conclusions from testing just one car... hell... you can't even draw them from a simple A-B test... you need to do an A-B-A test to eliminate the effects of the car "loosening up" or heat soaking.

I've done dozens of intake mods, and have seen and performed lots of dynos for filters. Simply changing out to a generic pod is typically pointless... and some of them, like Simotas, actually lose power versus stock pretty much all the time. But a good pod will run better than a bad stock system, and a properly designed warm-air or cold-air intake with proper flow will make significant gains in power.

There are dozens upon dozens of dyno-tests, shootouts and hundreds of dynos run by both experts and amateurs that show that intake modifications (sometimes) do make a difference... and yet somehow these guys "prove" they don't with just two sets of dynos with unnamed filters. Yeah... that's believable.

-

Increasingly, new cars are tuned specifically to make the best power with the stock system... Nissan's Z-Car and GT-R come to mind... as does the Peugeot/Ford 2.0 TDCI motor... and with complex MAF and MAP sensors and fuel table adjustments on the fly, they'll adapt to any intake you throw at them and either dial back or increase the power to compensate and bring the numbers back to normal. But this is not all new cars... so you really have to research your own personal vehicle to find out what works for it.

-

As for the threadstarter's question: No. Don't go Simota. K&N will typically give a little bit of gain... but not enough for what you need.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-27-2015)
Old 02-27-2015, 03:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
It just doesn't make sense. I am aware of the resonator but getting info on exactly what it does is hard. however common sense will tell you shorter pipe means less restriction = les suction motor has to do to get air in. my plan was to delete my air box completely. then modify it like in the first image. but that result showed cars performing better with the standard air box? so what if I do the mod showed in pic 2. still using the airbox just putting the filter at the end? but just improve cold air circulation.


Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0336.jpg
Views:	215
Size:	60.0 KB
ID:	17095

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0338.jpg
Views:	179
Size:	85.3 KB
ID:	17094
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2015, 04:33 AM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I think you could diddle with it all you want and at the end of the day you will still have to make that downshift.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (02-27-2015), mcrews (12-18-2015), Mustang Dave (03-21-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com