Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2017, 11:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
stefanv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 85

2001 Saturn - '01 Saturn SL1
90 day: 41.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 54 Times in 30 Posts
Cool Did almost as well in the city as on the highway

About 80% of my driving is country highway (80km/h, 50mph), and about 20% light city (city of about 200,000).

Yesterday, for the first time since I'd started concentrating on eco-driving (I won't quite call myself a hypermiler yet) two weeks ago, was the first time I needed to do some city driving.

I have the Torque app set up in my car, and I was pleased to find that my city fuel consumption was only marginally higher than my highway fuel consumption on the three previous days. Torque had recorded an average of 6.1L/100km (38.5mpg) for three days of highway, and 6.2L/100km (37.9mpg) for a 15 minute city drive, starting from a cold start (on a warm day).

Note that my actual fuel economy the last few tanks has been somewhat better than this, around 5.6L/100km (42mpg). The Torque app just isn't fully calibrated yet, but the relative comparison between city and highway on the same tank is probably still valid.

It kind of makes sense, since there's a lot more opportunity for improvement in stop-and-go city driving than in a steady cruise on mostly level ground.

By the way, a quick and easy way to convert from L/100km to mpg or vice versa is to divide into 235:

235 / X mpg = Y L/100km
235 / Y L/100km = X mpg

__________________
Stefan Vorkoetter: Programmer, hobbyist, amateur watchmaker, pilot, and collector of fountain pens, slide rules, calculators, and watches.


Last edited by stefanv; 07-12-2017 at 11:11 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-12-2017, 01:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Very nice! You're well on your way to being a hypermiler. Most of us can eek out better mileage in the city than on the highway. The aero losses are pretty big once you get up to speed. In the city, if you can minimize brake use, you're golden.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 02:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
stefanv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 85

2001 Saturn - '01 Saturn SL1
90 day: 41.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 54 Times in 30 Posts
I guess I'd better get to work on those aero mods to improve the highway fuel economy.
__________________
Stefan Vorkoetter: Programmer, hobbyist, amateur watchmaker, pilot, and collector of fountain pens, slide rules, calculators, and watches.

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2017, 11:48 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lurker, occasional poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: texas
Posts: 21

goldfrontier - '98 nissan frontier xe extended cab
Pickups
Team Nissan
90 day: 33.05 mpg (US)

silvertaco - '09 toyota tacoma prerunner
Pickups
90 day: 28.44 mpg (US)

Agcivicsedan - '17 Honda Civic Lx
Team Honda
90 day: 45.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
With a small pickup I almost always get better mileage in light to moderate down traffic than open highway. The poor drag coefficient of a truck really makes a difference.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2017, 07:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
I did this seven or eight years back: to more closely approximate Hwy mpg while in the city. The average speed is better (average, not absolute), the difficulty is in avoiding stops.

One has to be rigorous about the fewest engine starts. Constant use of engine block heater. And route planning.

The key was that, 90% of us go to 90% of the same places 90% of the time. Besides work, the usual round of errands.

I had a couple of routes to accomplish it all. Both involved using a freeway to go to the farthest point first. Then, no left turns, park for easy egress, etc. Used a four-piece grille block to force coolant temps.

And, as discipline, no driving at all at least one weekend day.

20% improvement from previous. I use 24-mpg for highway (in a pickup loaded 1100-lbs over baseline). City, in this period was 22 versus 18.

I've detailed this at greater length elsewhere. And on RV plus truck forums that to do as much would have paid for 5000-miles of vacation towing of my travel trailer based on a solid average; and at the then current fuel price

No one has ever taken me up by interest. This was always posted to specific threads on fuel economy. Including this forum around RV topics.

There was no sacrifice in convenience. I never did walk, bicycle or do other substitutions. No public transport. Nor shift a trip to my wife and her car.

As always, it's the percentage gain over the baseline.

Took it as a challenge from Diesel Dave as he set his record-breaking distance from one tank of fuel
.


Last edited by slowmover; 07-16-2017 at 07:57 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com