Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-24-2015, 09:25 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
.

Use a Zero gap top ring on the piston.

TOTAL SEAL PISTON RINGS



Buy a spray can of WS2.

Lower Friction


Coat piston skirts, cyl. bore, bearings and bearing surfaces, cam, crank, valve stems, lifters and rockers.

Be meticulous in your rebuild.

Do it right the first time...


>

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-24-2015, 02:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmick View Post
Block heaters are for old diesels.
File-fit rings are for racing engines where more gap than standard helps against ring butting at extreme temps. Can't even get them for any 3-cylinder because nobody races them.
Block heaters are for any one who does not want to start an ice cold engine or does not want to waste gas for 20 minutes warming up their icy vehicle to defrost it.
That is just an ignorant statement that tells us what you feel and has no bearing in reality.

You are 100% wrong about not being able to find file fit rings for a non raced application.
No one makes file fit rings for a 6.5L diesel but I have them.
I went with rings one over bore size up from your bore size and dermaled them to the gap I wanted.
That is all you have to do to get file fit rings for any application.

You are thinking about applications that require more gap than stock rings provide for use with a power adder such as nitrous or a lot of boost.
You don't file the rings wider than OEM for a N/A street engine, that would be pointless.
On an engine with a bore of roughly 4 inches such as my diesel, OEM rings would give you a typical gap of .030'' to .040''. I run about half that much gap, because I read the instructions on how to file fit rings.
For example, I bought a new 6.5L diesel block with the bore finished to standard diameter. So I got the next size up over bore rings +0.5mm.
I run a .018'' top, .014'' 2nd ring and .014'' oil ring.
I also run ultra low tension oil rings on my diesel (do not put low tension oil rings on a gasoline motor any of you).
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.

Last edited by oil pan 4; 05-24-2015 at 02:35 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 02:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
.

Use a Zero gap top ring on the piston.

TOTAL SEAL PISTON RINGS
I have seen people not recommended total seals for daily driver use.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 10:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I have seen people not recommended total seals for daily driver use.
Why is that?
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 12:17 AM   #15 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Now I remember why I don't care for them.

People who build and tear down engine who have used total seal rings claim that all the 2 ring halves on the total seal ring eventually line up and stay that way and that this is very common.
People who have used them called them a waste of money.
Engine builders advise people not to use them on daily drivers.
Some people complain about excessive oil consumption with them on daily driven cars.
Almost all racers that have used them end up going back to traditional moly plasma coated file fit rings after being unimpressed.
The rings are thin and very fragile compared to normal rings, because they are cramming 2 rings into the space of one.
This type of piston ring was originally invented for hydraulic cylinders and for use in air compressors. And that is where they should stay.
The people who swear by them sound exactly like the HHO believer cult.

You can get file fit for the same cost as regular rings most of the time.
All you have to do is fit them to the minimum recommended gap in the narrowest part of each cylinder.

Next engine I build will use speedpro molybdenum plasma coated top rings fitted to the minimum gap spec. A cast iron second and standard tension oil ring (because it will be a gasoline motor).
Almost exactly like I did with the diesel.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
pgfpro (05-25-2015)
Old 05-25-2015, 01:03 AM   #16 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,535

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,293
Thanked 590 Times in 380 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Now I remember why I don't care for them.

People who build and tear down engine who have used total seal rings claim that all the 2 ring halves on the total seal ring eventually line up and stay that way and that this is very common.
People who have used them called them a waste of money.
Engine builders advise people not to use them on daily drivers.
Some people complain about excessive oil consumption with them on daily driven cars.
Almost all racers that have used them end up going back to traditional moly plasma coated file fit rings after being unimpressed.
The rings are thin and very fragile compared to normal rings, because they are cramming 2 rings into the space of one.
This type of piston ring was originally invented for hydraulic cylinders and for use in air compressors. And that is where they should stay.
The people who swear by them sound exactly like the HHO believer cult.

You can get file fit for the same cost as regular rings most of the time.
All you have to do is fit them to the minimum recommended gap in the narrowest part of each cylinder.

Next engine I build will use speedpro molybdenum plasma coated top rings fitted to the minimum gap spec. A cast iron second and standard tension oil ring (because it will be a gasoline motor).
Almost exactly like I did with the diesel.
I 100% concur.

__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com