07-28-2012, 06:34 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Yes, technically, Cd does depend on Reynold's number, surface roughness, etc, etc., but those effects are pretty small. It's a fairly common assumtion that Cd is constant for a given shape, however. That's why there can be a Cd quoted for a given car. Technically a car will have different Cd's at different Reynold's numbers (and other factors), but often just assumed to be constant because those effects are fairly small.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-28-2012, 06:51 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...except for the Mythbuster idjiots, nobody I know of has "dimpled" their car's body-panels in an effort to reduce its Reynolds Number!
|
|
|
07-28-2012, 07:06 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Windsor ON Canada
Posts: 373
Thanks: 21
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
|
This is why i thind Cd is pointless advertising about fuel economy....Take any car and make it twice the size without increasing the weight... The Cd will be the same yet the original (smaller car) will have less wind resistance and get better fuel economy
__________________
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 10:11 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
If you are comparing two very similarly sized cars, then the one with a lower Cd is likely to get better mileage. More information is better. And lowering the Cd is the best way to improve the efficiency, after improving the drivetrain.
|
|
|
07-29-2012, 01:20 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
Advertising a car's Cd is an indication that they've at least paid attention to it. Nothing but good can come of manufacturers producing more aerodynamic vehicles, bragging about it, and thus making the public aware of its impact on efficiency.
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
08-02-2012, 07:20 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
worthless
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
what you wrote makes no sense to me.
I don't compare fish to birds. I don't compare tractor trailers to hatchbacks.
Comparing Cd is worthless between the two.
Cda is what matters, because if you combine speed, Cda, and weight, you can KNOW the drag of the car.
Cd is a way to sort of calculate Cda, but it is kind of worthless by itself.
|
The Cd of a car would give a potential consumer the same information as the thermal R-Factor for doors,windows,walls,and ceiling in a prospective home purchase,as the inverse of R-Factor is the Heat Transfer Coefficient for the home.A thermal Cd if you will.
The square footage of the home wood give an overall sense of energy efficiency as would the frontal area in a vehicle.
It is quite proper to compare Cds of aircraft,birds,submarines,bullets,fish,radomes,'n such,as they are all subject to the same forces and we can learn from their performance vs shape.
|
|
|
|