Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2021, 10:22 AM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,902
Thanks: 23,985
Thanked 7,226 Times in 4,653 Posts
vertical line

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
When the target is 22 degrees, in plan that's 44 degrees --close enough to 45.

In my experiment with Zeppelin-izing a Beetle I established a 45 degree bulkhead and found where the gentlest curve to reach it was.



The solid bulkhead is where a boat tail without the reflex curve would terminate. The open bulkhead is at the original bumper location. I think terminating in a vertical line instead of a low point would impart directional stability.

I guess I've never posted the picture, but I established that a Studebaker Starlight-style V-shaped window would not impair rear vision. Cooling would be through the front of the rear fenders. Oversize like Tatra to allow either side to work in a crosswind.
The 1981 VW-'Drop' Shape wind tunnel model had 100% boat-tailing in plan-view. At Cd 0.16, it made it to' candidate' status as a low drag basic body. The bummer was, just as with the Klemperer 'van' of 1922, which VW used for the VW 2000 concept; the driver couldn't see out of either the front or rear of the car.
As a NISSAN gravity-racer, with a supine driver, yes.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-01-2021, 08:59 AM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 68
Thanks: 54
Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts
Free to download:

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...00000/download
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tomi_k For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-03-2021), freebeard (11-01-2021)
Old 11-03-2021, 11:25 AM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,902
Thanks: 23,985
Thanked 7,226 Times in 4,653 Posts
Ahmed body

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomi_k View Post
From: SAE Paper 840300, by Ahmed et al. :
* The model exhibited it's highest drag at 30-degree downslope, Cd 0.378
* researchgate shows Cd 0.351- 0.365 for the same 30-degees.
* they might have kept testing until they 'proved' critical Reynolds number.
* at 30-degrees, they're in the 'forbidden zone' of bistable flow.
* the lowest drag was achieved with a 9-degree slope, at Cd 0.2298.
* with 10-degree plan-taper, and a 10-degree diffuser, the drag minimum of Cd 0.214, compared to Cd 0.25 for the initial model condition, according to Bearman et al.'s research.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know why they would intentionally choose the worst-case scenario to begin with. And the initial drag disparity is discomforting.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
drag penalty. spoiler, re-attached flow, rear window angle





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com