Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2011, 11:36 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
Yes

yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by mans View Post
mwebb, does that still apply if my skinny tire has 50 psi?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-29-2011, 12:27 AM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
Since the skinny tires have a SMALLER OD, then that is a mute point.

He is reducing his ability to react in an emergency to absolutely ZERO.
mcrews, in all respect why do you write that the skinny tires have a smaller od?

have you seen the links I provided?
this is a quite negative-sounding post.
I said earlier my stock tire is 195/60/R15 with a od of 23.75".

I provided a link where there is a choice of a 125mm tire and a 135mm.
the 125 is 23.00 od and the 135 is 23.57" od. the difference in od between the fat tire and the skinny tire is tiny.

you do raise a good point about stopping in an emergency. that seems to be a very valid point in my opinion, however we must explore how true it is, since many vehicles in europe have tires that are skinny like "euromodder" says above.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 12:45 AM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
quit while you are behind

mcrews is correctly telling you that there is nothing to be gained from the path you are on in terms of improving fuel economy and
you will be decreasing the stopping and handling capabilities of your car if you continue .

do you suppose that
with the CAFE values that are being imposed by our government that any current auto manufacturer that sells cars in the USA would install tires that hurt the CAFE # of the car ?
do you see any current cars with tiddley wink wheels / tires offered for sale today ?
no

get some Michelin Harmony s in 196 60 15 .
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 03:34 PM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 18

Slice - '12 Mazda 3 GS-Sky
90 day: 39.75 mpg (US)

Big Red - '09 Honda Silver Wing 600
90 day: 51.44 mpg (US)

5SPD5 II - '09 Mazda 5 GS
90 day: 29.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
One thing you can do is downsize the wheel to 14" if your brakes allow it, go with a lightweight wheel at that, and possibly go to say a low rolling resistance 175/65R14 tire which is common on an older Corolla. Just make sure the tire meets your car's speed and weight rating.

I highly advise against going with the old VW tires for all the reasons already mentioned.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 06:10 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
I'm not finding any 14" tires that are close to the right size that are also LRR, there are however a handful of 15" 175/65R15 tires that are.

Tire Search Results

And they are only 1/4" taller then stock on your car, so a really close fit, slightly narrower and LRR, I would call that a good match.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 06:36 PM   #36 (permalink)
Above-Average-Miler
 
abogart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 50

EcoCorsica - '96 Chevrolet Corsica Base
90 day: 32.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mans View Post
Hi guys,
while driving on the street I see the car in front of me with a doughnut on his rear wheel.
I can't help but notice how narrow the doughnut spare tire is, it looks like 1/2 the width of the normal tire.
At the minimized ground contact + the higher pressure of doughnut tires I thought to myself there should be way less rolling resistance if you were driving on 4 of these... tho you'd need to find ones that have the same outside diameter of your full size tires so you don't decrease your engine rev's.
I had the same thought when I got a flat and had to put the doughnut on my rear wheel. I guess great ecomodders think alike!

However, I also noticed that having that one spare tire on resulted in some slipping around turns and I think the anti-lock even kicked in once during braking, all on dry ground. And that was only driving 1 city block at less than 30mph to the tire store.

It sounds like a good idea, but I don't think that it's worth compromising traction and safety when the gains probably aren't going to be much more than you would get with a good set of LRR tires of the same size as you have now. Remember that the doughnuts are only rated for 50mph MAX speed.

My opinion is to spend that $400-some dollars on a good set of LRR tires. That way you still have traction and braking when you need it AND decreased rolling resistance. My guess is that doughnuts probably wouldn't get you much better economy that LRR tires.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 09:05 PM   #37 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
$400 for tires that handle like garbage, are speed limited to 50-55mph and have their load rating nearly maxed out by an empty vehicle really sounds like a waste of $$$.

Tire weight isn't as much of a factor as every one claims it is.
Taller tires with less rotations per mile (lower cruise RPM) seems to be where the real savings are found.
The only time taller heavier tires might hurt you is if your vehicle is so under powered it has trouble turning the size factory tires and maintaining or picking up speed.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 09:52 PM   #38 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
I'm not finding any 14" tires that are close to the right size that are also LRR, there are however a handful of 15" 175/65R15 tires that are.

Tire Search Results

And they are only 1/4" taller then stock on your car, so a really close fit, slightly narrower and LRR, I would call that a good match.
is it ok to mount 175 tires on rims that were made for 195's?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 10:24 PM   #39 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mans View Post
is it ok to mount 175 tires on rims that were made for 195's?
If you are looking at the Tire Rack web page and are looking at an exact tire, click on the "Specs" link and it will give the range of rims that they will work on, 5-6" rims for those.
They will also give rotations per mile, tire weight, tread wear, traction and other useful info.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 10:43 PM   #40 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post

Tire weight isn't as much of a factor as every one claims it is.
Taller tires with less rotations per mile (lower cruise RPM) seems to be where the real savings are found.
The only time taller heavier tires might hurt you is if your vehicle is so under powered it has trouble turning the size factory tires and maintaining or picking up speed.
Big Dave and I and countless others have found that bigger heavier tires on pickups don't lead to fe gains.

I think that's especially true on trucks with overdrive. Some of the real old school stuff with slushboxes and no overdrive could maybe benefit though. I think my a/t Tempos benefitted from going up in diameter ONE size.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com