08-11-2016, 10:55 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,590 Times in 1,556 Posts
|
Audi is working on a suspension that gets power from bumpy roads
Its not the first time we've heard of this, but its the first time I've heard of an OEM looking into it. The other times I've heard of it, it was universities doing research on it. Very cool stuff IMO.
Audi is working on a suspension that gets power from bumpy roads
Quote:
In testing, eROT recovered an average of 100 to 150 watts on a typical German road, three watts from a fresh piece of pavement, and 613 watts on a rough stretch of tarmac...
...
In the US, the Q7's supercharged 3.0-liter V6 returns a combined rating of 21 miles per gallon, which works out to 11.2 liters per 100 kilometers. Apply eROT's 0.7L/100km savings, and the Q7's economy would improve to 10.5L/100km, or 22.4 mpg, a 1.4-mpg improvement. That's not huge, but because math, 0.7L/100km is more dramatic on a more fuel efficient vehicle – taking an A3's 27-mpg combined rating and adding eROT would drive efficiency up 2.4 mpg, for example.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 11:14 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
Took 'em long enough...
There probably a lot more ways to make electricity from waste energies.
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 11:59 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 406
Thanks: 35
Thanked 143 Times in 105 Posts
|
I've thought about these things for a long time since I came up with a similar idea when I was a EE student about 30 years ago. The tests show how much energy is being recovered and I assume that means into the battery. I don't see anywhere that the testing includes the effect of what would almost certainly be a substantially heavier system than standard shock absorber system. Or maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Audi has been able to make a light weight generator/charger/battery system.
The part about additional mpg improvement in an already more efficient vehicle is probably wrong since the more efficient vehicle is likely that way due to aerodynamic properties which would over ride the linear function that the articles author is attempting to use. Just my thoughts.
I really would like to see this work, but I'm not sure the added complexity(and cost) makes it worthwhile.
JJ
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 12:21 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
We're out of gas. I've got a great idea... 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-11-2016, 12:28 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,302
Thanks: 2,374
Thanked 2,176 Times in 1,471 Posts
|
So they eliminate the alternator, or just use it very little? Is the supercharger electric? Heat recover would be cool too... those tiles that produce energy from heat. Combine heat recovery, solar panels, regen braking, suspension, and you could have some really goo- looking, low-profile, and substantial electricity production is a single car, no?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
08-11-2016, 02:12 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 812 Times in 595 Posts
|
Quote:
...but because math, 0.7L/100km is more dramatic on a more fuel efficient vehicle...
|
Probably not, because the more fuel efficient vehicle is almost certainly proportionately lighter. Less moving mass, less energy to recover.
As for what to do with the recovered energy, such a system is perfect for hybrids or full EVs.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-12-2016, 04:42 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,647
Thanks: 77
Thanked 713 Times in 452 Posts
|
Seems great for pulse and glide.
__________________

2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
08-12-2016, 09:59 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Volvo-driving MachYeen
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
|
sometimes my mate toyed with the idea of attaching a normal foot pump to the suspension of his pickup so it could fill a normal air tank for free 
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.
With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
|
|
|
08-12-2016, 12:16 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,421
Thanks: 8,369
Thanked 9,128 Times in 7,537 Posts
|
Makes more sense to me. Instead of a foot pump, could you use an air shock? If you figure out the one-way valving?
|
|
|
|