07-27-2015, 06:39 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
speeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
When my son got a Parrot a few years ago, I contemplated this. It only has a 25mph top speed. How about a 100-foot circle? The drone could orbit inside the vehicle and the wind would average out every few seconds.
I'm sure a quad- hex- or octa-copter could be built that would achieve freeway speeds. Then all you need is a 'follow-me' autopilot.
I'll go with $400.
|
For a 'real' vehicle,we'd only need 20-mph so it seems like a modest aerial vehicle would suffice.
A 100-ft circle would be great since as you mention,we'd be averaging out any winds if present,for a wind-spectra look at the yarn.And there are no vehicles anywhere near the car to add interference to the airflow.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 06:47 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
secret
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamZipPow
|
Yeah.They can't be running 24-hrs/day.And testing COULD be done 24-7-365.It's indoors,no weather.Strobe lights would freeze the tufts as I remember from physics lab.
If we revealed any of their formula-one secrets they could off us!
Some of the members might be geographically near these sites compared to the A-2 or DARKO,or other venues.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 06:55 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
cable camera
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
I was pretty sure that was his referent. I wouldn't want to fly a drone in a tunnel with a moving car in it.
Edit: how about a camera on a cablecar, like they use in football stadiums?
|
Absolutely! Great idea! If you can shoot half the body,you've essentially got the whole car.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 07:01 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
21-22 mph
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
Max horizontal speed on the one I checked (quad copter) that was close to $400, was 33 feet per second, or 21-22 mph.
regards
mech
|
It would be perfect.With tilt,pan.and zoom,we could look at virtually any tufted feature.
At Burning Man they might let you set off 50,000 cubic feet smoke cookies and image the smoke at Black Rock.Call it a momentary dynamic art installation piece.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 08:50 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Media Burn 1975
|
|
|
07-28-2015, 05:35 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
|
Would a camera attached to a kite towed behind the subject car be a simpler/cheaper solution?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Occasionally6 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-28-2015, 08:12 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
Would a camera attached to a kite towed behind the subject car be a simpler/cheaper solution?
|
Like the Germans did with their u-boats before radar drove them underwater.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-Achgelis_Fa_330
regards
mech
|
|
|
07-28-2015, 08:44 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
Would a camera attached to a kite towed behind the subject car be a simpler/cheaper solution?
|
How about a good helium baloon? The kite would only stay aloft while the vehicle is moving and I would not be confident of it landing gently.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2015, 05:11 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
kite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
Would a camera attached to a kite towed behind the subject car be a simpler/cheaper solution?
|
As long as it was a stable camera platform it would be just fine,and a whole lot cheaper for aft-body imaging.
A drone could advance ahead of the car,or circle, giving those views however.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
07-29-2015, 06:41 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Quote:
How about a good helium baloon?
|
Hot hydrogen dirigible full body of revolution. 12' cantilevered 'wiper arm' on the front bumper.
|
|
|
|