Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2012, 09:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 101 Times in 78 Posts
E on/off coasting questions

I have a few questions about the different techniques and overall economy.

I realize that engine off coasting down to the high gear min speed results in the best FE, but there are other factors.

Pop starting causes some clutch wear and the sudden quick spin up of a hot engine might result in some engine bearing wear.

When my glide ends at something under 25 mpg, as when coming up to a stop sign or light, I will pop start in 5th, then immediately clutch to a lower gear or neutral. Doing this means a much smoother gentle start which is obviously easier on the drivetrain.

This has me thinking that maybe a better technique might be to coast down to maybe 15-20, pop start in 5th, shift to third, accelerate ,skip back to 5th.

It does add a few gentle shifts, but, it eliminates the shock of instantly popping an engine up to a higher rpm.

Another option would be to just engine on coast or maybe engine off coast, start with the starter.

My guess is that with a diesel, engine on coasting might be just as good since diesels at idle use next to nothing for fuel. With a gasser with it's pesky stoichiometry concerns, engine on coasting more wasteful.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-14-2012, 06:53 AM   #2 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,391

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 55.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 530 Times in 335 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...gine-1141.html


But you are right that diesels are not in desperate need of EOC.

__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com