Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2008, 07:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
penny pincher
 
kevlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: IN
Posts: 124

lucky - '92 Toyota pickup plain
90 day: 32.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
easy bolt on mods?

I was wondering if anyone knows how well a K&N filter, or CAI (cone?) performs for economy. I know they're supposed to give more horsies. Will this improve mileage? Are there plugs that will also help?

__________________
Every dollar I save, .....I save!
half exposed Lucky http://ecomodder.com/forum/attachmen...1&d=1210727433

how it was done...

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post25264

as of feb. 09, still holding up great with new owner,
who has since re-geared the rear end and gets nearly 40 MPG!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-12-2008, 07:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Eh, I don't think the K&N will do anything, their website doesn't even claim it, .

Same for plugs, in my opinion. At least not enough to make it worth the energy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 07:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Extra airflow is really only good for increasing MPG on a diesel. On a gasser if you want more air just open the throttle more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 08:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
penny pincher
 
kevlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: IN
Posts: 124

lucky - '92 Toyota pickup plain
90 day: 32.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the reason I ask is because I am also an avid GM 3800 fan and belong to a forum http://www.3800pro.com.
I have had at least two 3800 Buicks for several years (one supercharged, one not) and have had great improvements with pulleys and high airflow intakes. I can average 30 MPG plus with the supercharged Park Ave on the highway, and have gotten 34 MPG plus with the Regal and acetone additive.
__________________
Every dollar I save, .....I save!
half exposed Lucky http://ecomodder.com/forum/attachmen...1&d=1210727433

how it was done...

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post25264

as of feb. 09, still holding up great with new owner,
who has since re-geared the rear end and gets nearly 40 MPG!

Last edited by kevlar; 05-12-2008 at 08:09 PM.. Reason: car type
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hi-Tech Redneck
 
Johnny Mullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Johnny Mullet Send a message via MSN to Johnny Mullet
I love the 3800 also! I had 2 Buick Lesabre models with that motor and a 1994 Supercharged Park Ave. Too bad they all rotted away on me.
__________________

GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
+1
Although I have never owned one I think that the 3800 is one of the best engines ever built across all manufacturers.
Its not totally inconceivable that lowered restriction could help MPGs but the CFM increase from a K&N when considered across the whole system would not be big enough to raise your MPG a measurable amount. Pulleys are another matter. I suspect your MPG success was more due to the latter combined with superior maintenance and efficient driving.

If intake airflow is a problem, I would look at modding to put in a larger filter before going to an K&N on a gasoline engine because K&N dont actually filter that well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 12:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
Giant Moving Eco-Wall
 
DifferentPointofView's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Dale, IL (or A-Dale)
Posts: 1,120

The Jeep! - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Laredo
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

The Caliber - '07 Dodge Caliber R/T
90 day: 30.6 mpg (US)

The 'Scort - '98 Ford Escort LX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Cone filters filter better than square drop in filters, so if you can get a cone K&N and fabricate the hosing with some ABS or PVC and some rubber i'd probably work.

For the guys who know they have a bomb-proof engine, a K&N might be worth it, might not be. Aluminum engines... run paper.
__________________


Yea.. I drive a Jeep and I'm on a fuel economy site, but you just wouldn't understand... "It's a Jeep thing!" *Jeep Wave*

Did I Use Too Many Abbreviations? Here's The Abbreviations List
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 10:36 AM   #8 (permalink)
Big El Cheapo
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 20

big swede - '01 SAAB 9-5 2.3lt
90 day: 31.96 mpg (US)

mighty mite - '09 Honda Fit Sport

The V - '02 Honda CR-V EX-4WD

Ody - '09 Honda Odyssey EX-L
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've heard from expert posters on bitog (bobistheoilguy.com/forums) that K&N's can allow a tad too much dirt into the engine as witnessed by high silicon readings in used oil analyses (UOAs). I had a drop in rectangular one on my 1997 SAAB 900 turbo and I can't say it did much for fuel economy or performance. Paper is going to give you much better filtration.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 10:52 AM   #9 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
The only benefits that an K&N provides are reduced restriction when the engine is at high rpm and at high load. If you are driving with any respect to fuel economy you'll never see that situation. Thus, the benefit is just not there.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 11:23 AM   #10 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684

Volt12 - '12 Chevy Volt base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
as for easy bolt on mods, air dam of some sort can be a simple bolt on... same with under body covers.. heck that can be a "zipstrip on" ..

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM mods the Sierra hybrid pickup: aerodynamic tweaks + LRR MetroMPG EcoModding Central 5 09-03-2012 09:17 AM
Easy Aero Fix? (Modding a pickup?) DifferentPointofView Aerodynamics 53 04-13-2012 06:46 PM
Large Pickup Aerodynamic Mods buckyball Aerodynamics 43 08-02-2008 06:49 PM
Radical Metro Aero Mods? Coyote X Aerodynamics 8 01-01-2008 05:05 PM
2006 in review: mods vs. technique. And the winner is... MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 16 12-10-2007 08:46 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com