Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2013, 02:15 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
Best way to test this is to pick up some hubcentric spacers and see what happens.

__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-06-2013, 03:05 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
But how to test the opposite direction offset?????
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 12:40 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
Pick up a set of wheels with a high offset, then gradually move it out with spacers. If you change the wheel design, that will affect the airflow and it won't be an apples-to-apples comparison.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 02:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
rav
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: albany, NY
Posts: 38

Gas HOG - '08 JEEP LIBERTY SPORT
Thanks: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks for the replies just ended up getting one of the most lightweight and aerodynamic wheels that Honda made:

Best of all they are made for a Honda fit with the same offset!!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rav For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-12-2013), Vwbeamer (06-10-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 05:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
I am at the moment doing CFD simulation to the offset matter. I am using a Drivaer 3d model with just drivers side and front wheel. Wheel is fully closed in the simulation so there is no cooling holes at the moment. So far it seems that if you move wheel inwards it helps with the drag. In first simulations wheel is not rotating.

- mm is inward movement
+mm is outward movement

+40mm 0,4961
+30mm 0,4870
+20mm 0,4908
+10mm 0,4896
STD 0,490
-10mm 0,4926
-20mm 0,4900
-30mm 0,4829
-40mm 0,4835

Next I will put convex hubcab there which will come outwards +20mm at the center. And for next runs I will also take down the actual forces as the frontal area changes little bit so the drag coefficient calculations are not exact. Frontal area grows from A=1,0218m2 to A convex capsels=1,0226m2

My guess for sweet spot is between -20 to -30mm range. Specially when wheels are rotating
After that I will try to put it then rotating. Pics will follow later
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast

Last edited by Vekke; 06-09-2022 at 05:46 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-09-2022), Piwoslaw (06-10-2022)
Old 06-09-2022, 11:02 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,121

Black Bullet - '19 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid Blue
Thanks: 1
Thanked 592 Times in 470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke View Post
I am at the moment doing CFD simulation to the offset matter. I am using a Drivaer 3d model with just drivers side and front wheel. Wheel is fully closed in the simulation so there is no cooling holes at the moment. So far it seems that if you move wheel inwards it helps with the drag. In first simulations wheel is not rotating.

- mm is inward movement
+mm is outward movement

+40mm 0,4961
+30mm 0,4870
+20mm 0,4908
+10mm 0,4896
STD 0,490
-10mm 0,4926
-20mm 0,4900
-30mm 0,4829
-40mm 0,4835

Next I will put convex hubcab there which will come outwards +20mm at the center. And for next runs I will also take down the actual forces as the frontal area changes little bit so the drag coefficient calculations are not exact. Frontal area grows from A=1,0218m2 to A convex capsels=1,0226m2

My guess for sweet spot is between -20 to -30mm range. Specially when wheels are rotating
After that I will try to put it then rotating. Pics will follow later
any thoughts on the hyundai ioniq blues hubcaps?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
alloy, drag, offset, steel





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com