Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2012, 12:57 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Fairly sure co-generation in commercial power plants uses the turbines exhaust heat to boil water for a steam trubine.
Or other working fluid. Often a fluid with a lower boiling point is used, as in geothermal plants. Which are basically the same technology: recovering energy from a relatively low-temperature source. See e.g. Ormat Technologies Inc. | ORMATŪ ENERGY CONVERTER (OEC)

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-02-2012, 03:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Speaking of electric power plants, what prevents the use of heat pumps to generate steam power from relatively low heat sources? I know geothermal heat is used to produce power in places such as Iceland, but why can't the same principle be applied in any location? Grab heat from the air or ground > condense it until the temperature exceeds boiling > make steam > generate power. If heat pumps can achieve 300% efficiency, it seems this method of power generation should be feasible anywhere.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:33 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Speaking of electric power plants, what prevents the use of heat pumps to generate steam power from relatively low heat sources? I know geothermal heat is used to produce power in places such as Iceland, but why can't the same principle be applied in any location? Grab heat from the air or ground > condense it until the temperature exceeds boiling > make steam > generate power. If heat pumps can achieve 300% efficiency, it seems this method of power generation should be feasible anywhere.
Er no, you never want to add another energy conversion process, it always represents a loss in efficiency.

The heat pump will consume more power than can ever be recovered from the waste heat, this is how thermodynamics works. The 300% represents the total heat moved per unit mechanical energy consumed, not the actual efficiency, otherwise it'd be a perpetual motion machine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 01:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,700

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,274
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
Also, heat pumps have high efficiency only when the temperature differential is relatively low. Boiling water is not where they thrive, unless the water you start with is only a few degrees below boiling.

Iceland uses geothermal energy from volcanos - pump water down into lava and get steam back. No HPs. And carrying a volcano around in your truck ain't gonna work.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 06:36 AM   #15 (permalink)
Always Too Busy
 
Flakbadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566

White Lightning - '17 Nissan Leaf SV
Team Leaf
90 day: 159.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
The most efficient IC engine is right at 55% and it can run on basically crude oil, virtually unrefined. That engine would not work in your car, with a 3 foot bore and an 9 foot stroke running at 92 RPM.
Mech, is that the engine from that giant Maersk container ship?
__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe

Current Car: White Lightning

----------------------------------------------

Retired Car: Betty White
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2012, 06:59 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Brake specific fuel consumption - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here are a few. To answer your question, yes one of the most efficient is used in giant container ships. Uses 285 tons of bunker fuel per day. No turbo. Sctoch yoke to eliminate side loads on piston. Engines run 24-7 for years.

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com