Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2012, 03:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
Interesting paper.

The red looks better than the blue. I don't know why the square back and notch back are so different, very strange. The blue defiantly had more air flowing, because of the bigger opening.

I don't think this paper applies completely, since my wheel wells are covered the air can not escape through the sides, but must exit under the body through the tire clearance holes in the belly pan.., my grill opening is minimal, I will be keeping most of the blue closed.

__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 11-15-2012 at 04:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-15-2012, 05:30 PM   #12 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
well you might consider you could be doing more harm than good. On the other hand the biggest difference it made was 0.004 in Cd over or under the base line.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 05:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
I would like to keep the flow smoother under the car to try to get better pressure recovery on the boat tail bottom surface.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 07:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
The question is does smother flow on the under side of the boat tail really going to get a net gain by disrupting air flow some where else?

What I think you are trying to say is that flow around the wheels is already disrupted and that a bigger disruption there won't matter. In this paper they show for both the notch back and the square back that isn't the case as drag increased when they blocked off the transmission tunnel. If this is the case for your car I can't say and I don't think any one else will be able to unless they have a wind tunnel that can measure Cd to the 3 digit after the decimal point.
__________________

Last edited by ConnClark; 11-15-2012 at 07:26 PM.. Reason: Typo corection
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 09:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
My car doesn't have a transmission tunnel.

"None of our men are 'experts.' We have most unfortunately found it necessary to get rid of a man as soon as he thinks himself an expert because no one ever considers himself expert if he really knows his job. A man who knows a job sees so much more to be done than he has done, that he is always pressing forward and never gives up an instant of thought to how good and how efficient he is. Thinking always ahead, thinking always of trying to do more, brings a state of mind in which nothing is impossible. The moment one gets into the 'expert' state of mind a great number of things become impossible.” " ... Henry Ford
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 11:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Over the hood. Will help reduce lift from air under the car.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 12:11 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Very interesting study. Slightly at odds with Buchheim, et. al., but interest anyway.

One take away was that the aero drag from cooling is linear with the amount of cooling air. Ecomodders have been proving that for a while
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 07:11 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
Maybe you could consider NACA vents on your belly pan, those should reduce the turbulences under the car siginificantly, comparing to grill like vents you've mentioned in a first post.
__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 07:56 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
NACA vents are low drag intake vents, not meant for exhaust.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_duct

I am considering streamlining the engine compartment, ducting the flow so it expands from the slit in the bumper to the radiator (diffuser) and then narrowing again to the exit and try to match the external flow velocity with minimum turbulence. I don't know if it can be done in practice, but I had something similar on an earlier saturn and that car would blow leaves out the back. I'll post progress on sc1 aeromods thread. I ordered more rivets, hopfully they will arrive today.
__________________
- Tony


Last edited by arcosine; 11-16-2012 at 08:04 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 08:43 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
Check out google for "reverse NACA duct"



Bring back the NACA duct..... - PistonHeads

NACA can work both ways. I've seen NACA-like outlet working as an exhaust tip, but can't find a photo right now to link it. It was just build as reverse of NACA inlet. So it was wider at the very end of the outlet and it was tapering to the front and the actual exhaust pipe. I'm hoping you get the idea from my description.

__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AndrzejM For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-17-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com