Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-14-2010, 11:19 AM   #161 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
You have now entered the realm of rocket science and have reinvented an ancient steam engine.

Aeolipile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would think that the design of the nozzles would be critical to produce the maximum thrust and it would help to streamline the elbows to reduce aero drag since they will be spinning at alternator rpm. Also, because it is a reaction engine dependent on the mass expelled to produce thrust, these supposedly consume a lot of steam vs. a positive-displacement engine, so plan on having a lot available.


Last edited by Patrick; 07-14-2010 at 11:24 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-14-2010, 11:46 AM   #162 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Haha yeah I didn't think it would be very efficient.

I do think I might try making my own turbine and go with the simple jet shooting steam at the turbine concept just to see if I can get it to work. All the other options seem to be a fair amount more complex.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2010, 04:31 PM   #163 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
I think that the air tool could work but the alternator would need to be rewound. Since you will be running it at a lower rpm than what the car's ICE would be spinning it and at a smaller range of RPMs by optimizing it based on that should help, like what homemade windmills do.

To see how someone has done this look here How To Rewind an Alternator
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 12:10 AM   #164 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Haha yeah I didn't think it would be very efficient.

I do think I might try making my own turbine and go with the simple jet shooting steam at the turbine concept just to see if I can get it to work. All the other options seem to be a fair amount more complex.
Have you considered using a smaller version of a brushless PMA ?


Patriot PMA
It may reduce the drive load for you and allow a simple air-tool to do the job. It might be worth looking for one to borrow and test. They are generally not very high output, but do work well at lower RPM.

There are different versions out there, and there are also options of motorcycle and bicycle alternators.

I suppose something like this might also be of interest to you.
Energy Systems and Design

I haven't used any of these listed, so I cannot vouch for any of the claims.
__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 12:42 AM   #165 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
Well I don't think anyone was talking about running the steam back into the primary engine. The idea was to use a separate steam-powered engine of some type to turn an alternator to keep the battery charged and eliminate the alternator load on the primary engine.
Originally the idea was to capture waste heat energy and do SOMETHING constructive with it.

Were I to be gung-ho about eliminating alternator load, I'd look at eliminating as much electrical componentry as possible, like an old "T" or Jeep- practically no nothing except exterior lighting. Then that lighting could be run from it's own battery that gets charged at home. For a carb'd gas engined "electricless" car a magneto could provide the spark; a diesel would need nothing except for starter juice; the gasser could even be started by crank.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 10:01 AM   #166 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
A brushless generator would definitely be more efficient and is a good idea for sure. I had just planned on using a regulator alternator since I had one laying around.

Anyone have numbers on efficiency between a PM generator and an alternator?
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:04 PM   #167 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 113

The SHOW - '95 Ford SHO Taurus
Thanks: 5
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Sorry, that would not work. Turbochargers spin incredibly fast. Smaller turbos can spin over 100,000 rpm, and some up to 200,000 rpm. Gearing it down is a big pita, you'd have to make your own journal bearings to take that kind of rpm input. Then you have to find something that will spin that fast without blowing up. It gets complex really fast.
I don't think they get anywhere near that when you are driving normal and not "spinning it up" the turbo with the ICE at high RPM for performance.

I am thinking a super low geared reduction box may very well do the trick. A turbo in the exhaust, with a 1000 (?) to one little reduction unit spinning the alternator! (OR A/C?) This seems VERY feasible to me.

Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:05 PM   #168 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 113

The SHOW - '95 Ford SHO Taurus
Thanks: 5
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Originally the idea was to capture waste heat energy and do SOMETHING constructive with it.

Were I to be gung-ho about eliminating alternator load, I'd look at eliminating as much electrical componentry as possible, like an old "T" or Jeep- practically no nothing except exterior lighting. Then that lighting could be run from it's own battery that gets charged at home. For a carb'd gas engined "electricless" car a magneto could provide the spark; a diesel would need nothing except for starter juice; the gasser could even be started by crank.
The "Mag" does take energy to spin it though.

Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:14 PM   #169 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARTINSR View Post
I don't think they get anywhere near that when you are driving normal and not "spinning it up" the turbo with the ICE at high RPM for performance.

I am thinking a super low geared reduction box may very well do the trick. A turbo in the exhaust, with a 1000 (?) to one little reduction unit spinning the alternator! (OR A/C?) This seems VERY feasible to me.

Brian
Where might one get a 1000:1 reduction gearbox inexpensively that will handle the power?
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 12:24 PM   #170 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 113

The SHOW - '95 Ford SHO Taurus
Thanks: 5
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
I don't know, I hadn't gotten that far.

Brian

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mimicking Gen3 Prius Exhaust Heat Recovery Daox EcoModding Central 77 08-01-2018 05:16 PM
Power and Heat considerations (enclosures, etc) dcb OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 22 03-31-2011 09:59 PM
High efficiency ICE (exhaust heat recovery) amnonholland EcoModding Central 21 06-27-2010 02:00 AM
Waste Heat from Exhaust TES111 EcoModding Central 35 11-21-2008 01:31 PM
Steam engine (from exhaust heat) iHero General Efficiency Discussion 23 09-08-2008 01:30 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com