Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2009, 02:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ex-lurker
 
i_am_socket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571

Skeeter - '05 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 35.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Fan question

I have no idea if this has been covered in some long lost thread or even brought it up myself and just don't remember, but I'm being lazy today and not searching (and actually have no idea why it popped into my head right now)

Anyway, I was walking around in a parking lot a while back and noticed on a Saab or BMW or something that the radiator fan was mounted on the front side of the rad vs facing the engine. This got me thinking about all the time I spent in computer modding and when doing chip cooling it's more efficient to push air through the heat sinks than pull it out.

Would this concept apply to automotive cooling as well? Would it be more efficient (fan stays on for a shorter amount of time) to have the fan blowing air through the rad instead of pulling air through it?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-08-2009, 02:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
It is about 50/50. Mainly depending on the ability of the fan to maintain a certain static pressure and on which side of the fan this pressure is designed to hold. Depending on the turbulence created by the fan blades pushing though fins could be less efficient. On the other hand turbulence and pressure drops created by the fins makes the fan less efficient when pulling.

Edit:
Similar argument regarding computer cases. Do you pressurize the case with intake fans or create a negative pressure case with exhaust fans. Both seem to work as long as the air flow passes by and through the CPU heatsink which is the thing that matters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 03:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
ncs
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 45

RockMagnet - '04 Subaru Impreza wagon WRX
90 day: 26.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Unless you are stopped, putting another obstruction(the fan) in front of the radiator for air to go around isn't going to help.

There's also the dead air space right behind the fan's motor. Unless you build a proper shroud and mount the fans several inches from the surface of the radiator, you'll still be faced with dead spots.

The ideal setup is to have a single, large, speed modulated electric fan mounted behind the radiator, with a shroud completely sealed to the core, and flaps that open when the incoming air speed exceeds the fans capacity. Packaging constraints prevent this kind of setup on most vehicles due to the large plenum needed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 03:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211

The White Car - '84 Mercedes-Benz 300td
90 day: 28.84 mpg (US)

The Blue Car - '86 BMW 535i
Last 3: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
The fans you saw are auxiliary, not main, fans. They turn on for additional cooling and when the A/C is on.

The main fan is always behind the radiator. Having the main fan behind the radiator is more efficient and allows for a shroud with bypass flaps for higher-airflow operation on the highway.

Go to aftermarket fan sites (i.e. SPAL) and you'll see that pusher fans are rated less than puller fans.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 04:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ex-lurker
 
i_am_socket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571

Skeeter - '05 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 35.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Ok, that definitely clears things up. With chip cooling, dead spots were dealt with by using spacers, but the incoming airflow from moving wasn't really a concern

(as far as case cooling, I was always a fan of positive pressure for dust reduction)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 05:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
maybe the fan was used as a generator instead of a fan. nt

.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric Fan Conversion (Ford Ranger) allc0re EcoModding Central 13 05-01-2014 11:07 AM
Electric vs. belt driven cooling fan Gregte EcoModding Central 63 06-18-2013 07:42 AM
electric fan question round.boater EcoModding Central 27 11-30-2009 01:01 AM
Fan tool (special tool for fan removal) GasGuage DIY / How-to 5 01-01-2009 02:47 PM
Honda civic fan speed control possible mod Vince-HX EcoModding Central 0 08-17-2008 11:48 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com