Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2011, 09:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Fighting the kickdown of an Auto tranny w the SGII!!

While driving my van with the scanguage it occurred to me there may be a guage on it that can help me predict how much more throttle I can give the ole girl without making the transmission downshift. I live in a rather hilly area, so this is info well worth looking for.

After cycling through the guages during a rather boring drive, I realized the LOD gauge is just the ticket. LOD is the measure of the percentage of load on the engine for the current throttle position; or at least that's what I'm pretty sure it is.

Anyway, 99 is as high as it will go. When the LOD guage reads 99, and you press the gas pedal further, it will downshift very soon. But if I keep the LOD reading less than 99, and my speed doesn't drop too much, I can keep it in top gear longer. So I aimed to keep the LOD guage less than 95, and kept the 4000 lb rig from downshifting nearly as much as it usually does.

Doing this I've been able to get my tank average to about 24, compared to my normal average of about 20 (in a vehicle rated to give 17 ) I figured those of you with a scanguage and an auto would be interested in this.

__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-21-2011, 09:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 18

Rover - '10 Mazda Tribute isport
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
I too noticed what you are talking about with the LOD indicator. The mysterious thing in the case of my Ford Escape with 6 speed automatic is that this 99 rule applies when the "cruise control is on". When driving normally without cruise the transmission seems to downshift at just the slightest increase in throttle position. I'm going to do a bit more checking, but it would appear that my transmission computer is going to give better fuel economy while the car is in cruise mode by design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 10:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
My motor can't physically exceed 40% load, even at wot.

That thing never made much sense to me. Always figured it was almost useless when driving an auto. Also it does take much on some of my vehicles to go into open loop, maybe 70% throttle
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 11:06 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
I use LOD to prevent gear kickdown on my wife's 2006 AT Hyundai Elantra. If I keep LOD below 70 on hill climbs, the transmission stays in TC lockup.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 05:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmiwb View Post
I too noticed what you are talking about with the LOD indicator. The mysterious thing in the case of my Ford Escape with 6 speed automatic is that this 99 rule applies when the "cruise control is on". When driving normally without cruise the transmission seems to downshift at just the slightest increase in throttle position. I'm going to do a bit more checking, but it would appear that my transmission computer is going to give better fuel economy while the car is in cruise mode by design.
I noticed with my Buick LeSabre and Pontiac Transport the cruise control seemed to make the car willing to lug the engine when climbing a hill, as compared to using the foot pedal. Wish there was a way to modify the tranny computer to alter the kickdown throttle position at will. I tried this by adjusting the throttle position sensor on my maxima, but it made the engine run rough, so I put it back. Only modification I can think of is to get another TPS, attach it to the throttle, then hook the harness going to the transmission to the alternate TPS.

IDK, just wish they both were manuals. I hate not being able to tell the car what gear I want it to be in.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 05:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
LOD = 80 = where my auto downshifts.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2011, 05:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
95 LOD is the mark on my Odyssey.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 12:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Above-Average-Miler
 
abogart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 50

EcoCorsica - '96 Chevrolet Corsica Base
90 day: 32.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
My motor can't physically exceed 40% load, even at wot.
Mine does the same thing. With the gear selector in L, above about 20 mph I can put the pedal to the floor and the trans will hold 2nd gear. Technically this should be 100% load (or 99 LOD indicated on the SG) but mine only reads about 40 or so. I think on some older vehicles this reading is a measure of actual torque or HP compared to maximum engine torque or HP at any rpm. So even though the engine is generating as much power as it can at 3000 to 4000 rpm, it would still generate more at wot at the 5600 rpm red line.

I use the MAP reading as a more accurate gauge of engine load. With the engine off, pressure is balanced between the intake manifold and outside atmosphere, reading 14.3 psi (0 MAP is essentially a perfect vacuum). I aim to accelerate to speed at about 10 and cruise at 55 mph is usually 7.0 to 7.2. After the TC locks, about 13.5 will cause it to unlock, which is about 95% actual engine load.
__________________

Last edited by abogart; 04-03-2011 at 12:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 02:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
On my vehicles (2 Nissans essentially) the MAP reading doesn't seem to work right. I'm sure things will vary from car to car. I do like the resolution I get with the LOD guage on mine, since it does vary from 10 to 99. I can push it right up to 98 without a downshift, but just a bit more of a squeeze I'll get a guaranteed downshift.

I assume the LOD guage is a calculation of the theroetical load by reading different sensors, but I wonder how it is calculated exactly? My guess is that it has to do with speed, rpms and throttle position, but it will also vary depending on the grade of hill I'm going up (there's a lot of hills in the Ozarks.) So is it the MAP reading that also comes into play when calculating the LOD?
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 10:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Above-Average-Miler
 
abogart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 50

EcoCorsica - '96 Chevrolet Corsica Base
90 day: 32.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
So is it the MAP reading that also comes into play when calculating the LOD?
I would think so. The MAP is basically a direct reading of engine load. Here at 628 feet above sea level, the atmospheric pressure is almost always 14.3 psi, which is what the MAP sensor reads with the ignition on and engine stopped. One can draw the conclusion that 14.3 MAP with the engine running would be 100% load. However, I'm not quite sure how the bottom end is calculated. It wouldn't be reasonable to assume that 0 MAP is 0 LOD, because that is a perfect vacuum (and very hard to obtain). Perhaps there is a base value that represents 0 LOD, or maybe the GPH is factored in there as well somehow.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com