Well i've been unhappy with my cars performance and a few weeks ago I did a 90% grill block (cardboard and duct tape covering the whole bumper radiator inlet. There's 2 small holes above the bumper that i left open. I also put on a WAI on my car. Completely sucking intake charge from behing the exhaust manifold via aluminum dryer ducting. I swore I gained 5-8mpg.
So today I did some tests. I went to my mile long stretch and reset my mpguino at the start of the A-b and the B-A runs. My cruise control isn't accurate for this (long story), so I get the car up to 40mph and hold my foot as best i can at 40mph, I did 3 runs each way with and without the grill block.
A-B tests with bumper radiator inlet block off.
83.1, 84.4, 83.11 ave = 83.53mpg
B-A tests with bumper radiator inlet block off.
76.09, 75.5, 75.8 ave = 75.79mpg
A-B tests NO radiator blockoff.
77.4, 79.5, 76.8 ave = 77.9mpg
B-A tests NO radiator blockoff.
70.4, 69.8, 69.8 ave = 70.0mpg
Well I didn't do ABA testing where I would have put the radiator block back on, but I'm pretty convinced by the results. With A-B route I saw a 7.2% gain with the block and with B-A tests there was a 8.2% gain.
I really wish I had a wind tunnel with a dyno to test this more easily
I'm curious how this would effect the MPG at 65mph, and at 25mph. My tests were just at 40mph because that's the easiest road that's mostly flat near where I live.
By the way, I have zero bellypan under the engine bay. I was wondering how not having a belly pan was going to effect the results, but WOW, 7-8% increase.
FINAL NOTE: DON'T PUT DUCT TAPE ON YOUR PAINT IF YOU DON'T MIND IT COMING OFF. I lost some paint when i took it off. I'm going to now try making a styrofoam grill insert with perhaps a piece of cloroplast connected to it to cover the grill area.