![]() |
Friendly Wager: 60 mpg 95 Mercury Tracer
For some reason :rolleyes: I made a bet with some friends I could get 60 mpg highway (55 mph, or speed limit) with my newly acquired 95 Mercury Tracer. Some requirements have been made, but not everything has been agreed upon.
Biggest restriction is that it must be done by January 13th. The first day of spring semester. This may not be very feasible, but I am definitely going to try my best. The car:
Not the actual car: https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-m...474-tracer.jpg I have only driven the car for 2 days, so I don't know a whole lot about it. So far I have left it on empty with only 1-3 gallons in the tank. I have a GPS speedometer app on an old phone. It has an ODO function, but I haven't used it yet. Stipulations that have been set already:
I know I will need a lot to get there. Mods I will be looking at mainly: Boat tail Belly pan Wheel skirts and smooth covers Mirror delete for test runs Wiper delete (maybe) Hood height (think Aerohead's truck) 5th wheel or powering a single rear wheel So, what do you guys think? Is this possible? |
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-m...te-applied.png
I've used the template before, but is this applied correctly? |
Fuelly indicates 25-30 mpg average.
My Civic was rated at 30 (29-34 real world according to Fuelly) and the max I got was 60 mpg on the highway at 55 mph with a slight tailwind. P&G was 50s around town. IMO you'll need a boattail and a manual swap (since the older automatics will be dreadfully inefficient) in order to do engine off coasting, unless you swapped in something like the Insight's 1.0L drivetrain and manual transmission. I personally don't see the possibility of doing it but look forward to see what you do with it. Maybe I'm wrong, I'd love to be wrong in this case! Your largest enemy besides drag is probably the automatic transmission. |
If you let it run to empty, you'll start having fuel pump failures as fuel is lube and coolant.
|
Quote:
|
At 55 MPH, you're definitely going to have to attack more than just aero. And I doubt the small bits of aero stuff will be worth it. Since it's a one time deal, how about 4 mini spares to lower the rolling resistance. Should be nearly free and maybe net some decent gains?
I'd plug some numbers in to the Aerodynamic & rolling resistance, power & MPG calculator here at Ecomodder. It'll show you just where the power is going rolling down the road at 55 MPH. |
I wouldn't bother with the hood height. Wipers probably won't matter either, but they're easy enough to remove. If the tires are in good shape with no cracks, I'd pump them way up for the test. Maybe 70-80 PSI? Mini spares usually have higher rolling resistance and smaller diameter. Taller LRR tires would help gearing. Getting the engine to run lean will help. Full belly pan and get the rear to match the template. Front end is probably OK, but I'd do spats in front of the tires. Can you remove accessory belts? You only need the water pump to drive 60 miles if you have a good, fully-charged battery. Weight reduction if there will be any stop-and-go or hills. Mobil 1 Advance Fuel Economy oil (0w-30, 0w-20, 0w-16). Fill it to the lower mark on the dipstick. Ethanol free regular octane if you can find it. Make sure there's no brake drag. MPGuino to test mods (if you have a good VSS). Trade it for a Geo Metro! :D
Pick a warm day! And try to run out of gas as you crest a big hill for a long coast! :) |
donuts
https://forkenswift.com/album/8-spar...angles-800.jpg
Quote:
Thread: Testing rolling resistance of the Various Tires of the Suzukiclone Fleet (RE92 wins) Obviously I'm not saying the same thing will happen with every brand of space-saver tire, but it does show it's not safe to assume a happy & efficient improvement. |
IIRC these are quite lightweight, which would render it easier to achieve some high MPG without too much effort, but the old-school AT might become an issue.
|
I used to own a 90s 1.9L sohc auto trans as well. Mostly stock it would do around 50mpg @ 45mph, and 43mpg @ 55 mph according to a scangauge
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post327783 That car was rated 33 hwy, the tracer appears to be rated 31hwy, so I’m guessing in stock form you could pull roughly 40mpg @ 55mph. Looking like you’ll need a 50% improvement over stock to hit your original goal. 50mpg @ 50mph might be a good first goal |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com