Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-27-2017, 10:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Lightbulb Fuel heater?

We all know that warm fuel vaporizes better than cold fuel, so I had an idea. I want to make a fuel heater for my Civic that uses coolant to heat the fuel. My Civic has a returnless fuel system, so a fuel heater won't heat the fuel in the tank. I think a fuel heater could possibly improve gas mileage by improving fuel vaporization, especially in cold weather, but I'm not sure. I don't really think that building a fuel heater would improve anything, since all the car companies would probably be doing it if it would, and I probably am not the first to think of this. Can't hurt to ask though, right? What do you think about me making a fuel heater?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-27-2017, 10:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Google Search Results - EcoModder.com
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 01:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
For winter use only, might as well.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 09:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
It wont hurt, but probably won't help too much either. OEMs kind of do this already. With port injection engines, they typically aim the injector to spray onto the intake valve which is quite hot to help vaporize the fuel. In throttle body injection which is pretty old tech theses days, they warm up the throttle body to help vaporization through the intake manifold similar to a carburetor. Direct injection I don't think warms things up, but its being shot through tiny injector holes and injected at massively higher PSI than the others. So vaporization is less an issue, plus being injected right into the combustion chamber helps vaporize things quickly.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 08:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: wi
Posts: 13
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
From reading the service manual, i found my car ('15 mirage) has a fuel temperature sensor so i feel it must have a worthy impact or OEM simply wouldnt bother
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MightyMirage For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (11-28-2017)
Old 11-28-2017, 09:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyMirage View Post
From reading the service manual, i found my car ('15 mirage) has a fuel temperature sensor so i feel it must have a worthy impact or OEM simply wouldnt bother
Not necessarily. Temperature effects the density of the fuel, which is likely why it has the sensor, but the density of the fuel will obviously effect how much fuel the engine needs to run at a certain A/F ratio. The same reason why the car has an air temp sensor in the intake.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 12:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: wi
Posts: 13
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Edit i just realized a huge hole in my theory

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_2017-11-28-19-39-40.jpg
Views:	213
Size:	29.5 KB
ID:	23071  

Last edited by MightyMirage; 11-29-2017 at 12:17 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com