Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2008, 07:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Frank Lee's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,550 Times in 2,216 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper View Post
Whoa. The 2009 F150 4X4 Supercab weighs 5434 lbs!
I don't like the current gen F150 ONE BIT! I've driven one and it felt so huge, ponderous, and chunky- lots of completely unnecessary and undesireable bulk. And, it was much less maneuverable than mine- hard to tell where the corners were- poor visibility out. And, for gosh sakes, how do they expect anyone to have access to stuff in the box when they make the dang thing 5 1/2 feet up in the air? I'm 6'4" and it looks like I'd have to climb into the box to reach/do anything back there whereas on mine I can generally reach anything in there from standing next to the side of the truck. Oh, that's right: trucks these days are made for commuting and the box doesn't actually get used for anything anyway.


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 11-23-2008, 07:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Big Dave's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
How can you do a decent pulse & glide with an automatic?

On the plus side, I found an outfit that converts "B" body GMs to the T-56. That means they could easily do the same with a GM pickup. I'm wondering if they could put a T-56 behind a 617.952 five-banger in a W123 Benz.
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 09:13 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: southern, wv
Posts: 353

Johnny 5 - '81 Honda Cm400e
90 day: 42.86 mpg (US)

Da bike - '06 Honda Shadow Vlx deluxe
90 day: 59.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
the xfe use light wheels better areo, and llr tires. maybe gears but they already run low.

i was able to pull off A 23 MPG trip(~100miles) in my dad 08 silverado crew cab 4x4 w/ factory 20's 5.3 auto., by driving with load and watchin the instant gas gauge, tried to keep it in v4 mode as much as possible.

,ost newer manual truck are rated lower than there auto counterparts.

but 20 is not bad for a pig

(my 98 4x4 truck weighted in at 3170lbs and is rated at 16/20)

20 mpg is what i am gettin out of my 09 v6 auto 4x4 excab trdsprt tacoma not driving easy
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 09:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 810 Times in 594 Posts
Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
The problem with trucks right now is they are sold on capacity.
They are? Could have fooled me - I thought they were sold on how closely they can be made to resemble a penis :-)

Seriously, though: from what I've seen of current-generation pickups, the bed is no larger than that of old '60s Fords & Chevys. They've just wrapped more sheet metal around it: where the '60 model might have a single layer of metal, or two layers an inch or two apart, the current models loot to have 6-8 inches or more. Then there's the vertical dimension: jacked up suspension on absurdly large tires, then the body thickened by a foot or more... Well, just look at a '65 Ford Ford Truck History - Pictures of Vintage Ford Trucks and compare it to current models.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 11:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
welcome wuling

the specs on the WuLing sunshine are there, as well as pics.

5.5L/100KM... about 51mpg rated. Only available in 5 speed, said to be sold retail for around $5000 or so. Kinda like a ecomodder's dream, no? Cheap but new, 5 spd only, already efficient, needs aero improvement.

Meets the criteria, it would seem.
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 12:15 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I tend to agree with that, but...

ratings for my '94 were better for the a/t vs m/t!

fueleconomy.gov: 12/17 a/t; 12/16 m/t
The automakers had this bad habit of giving the AT a deeper OD ratio than the manual had. If you look at a truck like the super duty where the OD ratios are the same between the AT & MT, the MT wipes the floor on the AT when it comes to FE.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Court Voids Mileage Standards for Light Trucks SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 6 01-13-2013 04:27 AM
The Cars GM Needs To Make Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 66 01-05-2009 03:18 PM
Video: recently "resurrected" GM EV1 - fresh news! MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 11 01-03-2009 08:04 PM
News: Cobalt XFE sales 2x more popular than estimated, more XFE models coming MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 27 07-30-2008 08:42 PM
My eventful 24 hours (GM conference and car troublez) SVOboy The Lounge 6 05-08-2008 11:33 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com