Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2021, 07:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 54.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Gone with the wind (or something like that)

I came across a video about an astonishing wind powered vehicle that travels faster that the wind going straight downwind.
So it moves forward faster than the wind and even accelerates while encountering a virtual headwind. There is even a vane on the tip of the craft that goes backwards, indicating virtual headwind.

Impossible, a trick? I could not work it out until well into the video:


I can explain how it works more clearly than the video does, if anyone is interested.

The same car could well be used to drive straight into the wind, it just needs different gearing then (more propeller rotations per distance traveled).

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-02-2021), redneck (05-31-2021)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-31-2021, 09:45 AM   #2 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 214.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
This reminds me of when people were claiming rockets can't move in space because there is nothing to push against.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2021, 10:38 AM   #3 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,434
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
Watching the whole tower sway with the turbine revolution was scary.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2021, 02:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 214.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
There's an interesting paradox going on here: The car can be either wind- or ground powered depending on which inertial frame of reference we choose, but if we look at the mechanisms inside the car, then energy is always transferred from the wheels to the propeller.

Now the question is: How can that be? Shouldn't we see energy flowing in the other direction while we are standing on the ground and observing the car be wind powered?
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2021, 11:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,434
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
Transferring energy to the prop only results in a drag moment aka brakes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2021, 11:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 386

Aerospyder - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.98 mpg (US)

Simme - '83 IFA Simson Suhl S51
Motorcycle
90 day: 76.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 183 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
This reminds me of when people were claiming rockets can't move in space because there is nothing to push against.
They can't because there isn't anything for the rocket engine to push against as there is no athmosphere.

/sarcsm
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2021, 04:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 54.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
The thing to keep in mind is that the wind is not pushing the car body but rather the propeller.

Obviously the wind could not push the car if it is moving faster than the wind, but the propeller is turning slowly against the wind, powered by the wheels.
Its blades form a surface that moves forward more slowly than the car does, and slightly slower than the wind. So the wind is still pushing against the blades.

The force acting on the blades can be split in a forward vector and a counterrotating vector.
If the blades are angled at 45 degrees, they would be equal in force.

When the blades rotate more slowly than the car moves forward, the forward force transfers to a greater force (at a lower speed) through the gearing that powers the propeller. If the difference exceeds all sources of friction the vehicle will accelerate and move past the wind speed.
We have a theory to match the results

Now let's check what happens if the setup or gearing changes.
If the propeller does not move the car will sail forward with the wind, but never as fast.

If the propeller moves with the wind rather than against it then the gearing would help power it forward, but of course the wind would not be able to power the blades well before the vehicle nears wind speed. You'd have great pulling power at low speed though.

If the propeller moves as fast as the vehicle (e.g. the surface of the vanes does not move compared to a fixed point on the ground, as it moves just as fast backwards compared to the car as the car moves forward) then the forward and counterrotating forces are in balance; it won't move the vehicle no matter what.

If the propeller moves faster than the vehicle then the vehicle will run backwards against the wind.

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 06-18-2021 at 07:53 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com