Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2012, 06:20 AM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
I sealed off my engine compartment and put the air intake in side with the engine, it's good for +75 degrees F (my car is a turbo diesel so YMMV). I believe preheating the intake air improves fuel economy, as I believe cooling the intake air improves horsepower. Economy is about maximizing the energy recovery from the fuel, horsepower is about maximizing the energy recovery from the oxidizer. Since when shooting for max horsepower one can easily add fuel to the system, the limit on horsepower comes from running out of oxygen. When shooting for max mileage, you're not running full throttle anyway so you aren't limited by air density.

__________________
Modding MAX, a Kubota-powered classic sports car
http://www.kineticvehicles.com
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-19-2012, 11:56 PM   #22 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with gasoline engines the idea is to preheat the fuel for easier ignition, and to chill the air to make it more dense.
Pre-heat the fuel is more usual in few flexfuel cars. I've never seen a pure gasser with this feature. It's a stock feature in some versions of the Volkswagen Polo made in Brazil and the Peugeot 308 made in Argentina, since Brazilian ethanol doesn't have the gasoline blend to ease the cold starts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 02:35 AM   #23 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMcCornack View Post
I sealed off my engine compartment and put the air intake in side with the engine, it's good for +75 degrees F (my car is a turbo diesel so YMMV).
Did you test it?
Diesels tend to lose power and fuel economy with warm air intakes.

Diesels seem to like their air intake temperatures at the manifold between 30F to 120F.
Below 30F and it seems to delay fuel ignition and above 120 and you cant pack enough air into the cylinders.

Every +1 degree C or F increase in intake temperatuers increases EGTs by that amount, so you are running 75 degree higher EGTs than nessary for no reason.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 01:29 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 56 Times in 46 Posts
i can't speak for diesel in particular, but with a gasoline enigne, a hotter intake charge is the way to go for fuel economy.

hotter air is less dense, which provides a couple of benefits, mostly being the reduced pumping losses due to having to open the throttle more to achieve the same cylinder airmass and a less dense air charge providing less resistance to movement. hotter air, i would assume also helps gasoline vaporization.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 11:10 PM   #25 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
Hot air provides not benifet to diesels, unless its really cold out.
The different processes at work between the gas and diesel engines are very different.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 01:28 AM   #26 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Hot air provides not benifet to diesels, unless its really cold out.
Only in extreme cases some intake heating is desirable with a Diesel, like the grid-heater used in Cummins engines.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 10:54 AM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Jakins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 252

hX-TREME!!! - '97 Honda Civic HX
90 day: 54.75 mpg (US)

450sX-TREME!!! - '95 Nissan V8 240sx

chodercycle - '06 kawasaki ninja zx6r 636
Thanks: 18
Thanked 43 Times in 23 Posts
I have my intake pipe touching one of my I take hose taking air from the radiator. I don't have any hard mumbers but it seems like it works. I've heard of pre heating gas. It seems like a potentially good way to get huge milage. Obviously it's kind of dangerous and you may be taking a risk by doing it but I want to find a way. Maybe by running the fuel line near the exhaust or coolant lines.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 01:16 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbus
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I have found that because ECO modding is somewhat new on the car scene. And because the US car scene has really always been about bigger louder faster is better. There is quite a bit of mis-imformation out there. For so long all "tuners" and "gear heads" were only interested in power and speed. This shaped most if not all of car modifications and tunning concepts. It can be hard to find good ECO modding information out there. So i can understand the hot air vs cold air debates ect...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 01:30 PM   #29 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,892

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 508
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Pre-heat the fuel is more usual in few flexfuel cars. I've never seen a pure gasser with this feature. It's a stock feature in some versions of the Volkswagen Polo made in Brazil and the Peugeot 308 made in Argentina, since Brazilian ethanol doesn't have the gasoline blend to ease the cold starts.
Oddly I ran one test on my cobalt where I heated the fuel tank up to about 150 degrees (average temp was probably only 100-120) when it was very cold out. The results I got where quite impressive, my engine temperature climbed to 110 in about 1 minute when it normally takes a while to get there, my fe was also much higher per the lie o meter.

It impressed me enough that I would like to locate a well controlled heating system (as oppossed to a magnet I have to watch like a hauk with the infa red)

Cheers
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 03:58 AM   #30 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugen View Post
So i can understand the hot air vs cold air debates ect...
There is no debate.
Most people don't understand how fundamentally different gas and diesel engines are.
Diesels need cool air (not bitterly cold air) for better milage, gas engines usually need warm or hot air for better milage.
Simple thermodynamics lays it all out for us.
Factory manuals spell it out for the no so thermodymanicly inclined, cummins has recommendations that their engines draw air from out side the engine enclosure in all but the coldest climates "for the best fuel economy and performance".

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com