02-15-2024, 12:23 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,329
Thanks: 24,452
Thanked 7,392 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
' gaps as VGs '
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phase
Can’t panel gaps also act as mini vortex generators and accelerate the flow?
|
Nope!
* From Hucho, Janssen, and Emmelmann, SAE Paper # 760185, Page-15, Figure 27, we're instructed that a 'gap' can only trigger TBL separation, and only on a 'roof.'
* Tripping the flow 'ahead' of an 'adverse-positive-pressure-gradient-inducing roofline, prohibits the flow separation-induced downwash drag and lift which would otherwise develop, had the flow not been intentionally separated.
* With the 1st-gen Golf-Rabbit, simply taping the rear hatch gap on the roof, caused the drag to degrade from Cd 0.42, to Cd 0.48 ( 14% ), along with 28% increased rear lift, due to the counterrotating vortex pair, low pressure downwash vector 'above' the backlight, and small, low-pressure wake.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Any form of VG would have to 'protrude' into the TBL, rather than reside within some body recess.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-15-2024, 01:30 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 592 Times in 470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
Nope!
* From Hucho, Janssen, and Emmelmann, SAE Paper # 760185, Page-15, Figure 27, we're instructed that a 'gap' can only trigger TBL separation, and only on a 'roof.'
* Tripping the flow 'ahead' of an 'adverse-positive-pressure-gradient-inducing roofline, prohibits the flow separation-induced downwash drag and lift which would otherwise develop, had the flow not been intentionally separated.
* With the 1st-gen Golf-Rabbit, simply taping the rear hatch gap on the roof, caused the drag to degrade from Cd 0.42, to Cd 0.48 ( 14% ), along with 28% increased rear lift, due to the counterrotating vortex pair, low pressure downwash vector 'above' the backlight, and small, low-pressure wake.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Any form of VG would have to 'protrude' into the TBL, rather than reside within some body recess.
|
Taping over the gap increase drag? I’m confused
|
|
|
02-15-2024, 05:52 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That is a good consideration. My current focus in on the front of the vehicle where i'm hoping to maintain least amount of approach drag. Could be a low to zero benefit, but I prefer to test and verify for myself and move on.
Thanks for the feed back
|
|
|
02-17-2024, 12:42 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,329
Thanks: 24,452
Thanked 7,392 Times in 4,787 Posts
|
' taping over the gap '
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phase
Taping over the gap increase drag? I’m confused
|
1) On the Golf-I, the roofline was not 'aerodynamic', as designed by ItalDesign, and prone to Cd 0.48.
2) Hucho et al. investigated 'BandAids' for the Beetle's replacement, in their new wind tunnel.
3) They achieved Cd 0.34 using a 'template' roofline, but that was shot down in committee because it didn't 'look' like the ItalDesign car ( which is a legal requirement between a contracting manufacturer and designer ).
4) 'Taping' the rear hatch roof gap was one of the things they tried in the pursuit of a lower Cd, but discovered that the gap was producing a lower drag 'squareback' wake, compared to a higher drag pseudo-Jaray wake of 'small', but low-pressure/ high drag/ high lift ( exactly as VW-Porsche found on the 1972 911 Carrera RS 2.7, 'Pete' Brock with the Shelby Cobra Daytona Coupe, and Bob Lutz with the Dodge Viper Coupe ).
5) So, by leaving the gap open, they were allowed to get from Cd 0.48, down to Cd 0.43, for the 'final' production shape.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
02-19-2024, 02:28 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513
2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US) 2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H 90 day: 17.08 mpg (US) 2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US) 2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US) 2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe 90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean T.
So... I know the traditional material for random aero testing is usually painters tape, and I love the color against the color of my paint, but it simply isn't practical... It gets wet and then is tremendously difficult to remove...
What about electrical tape? would the thickness of electrical tape defeat the purpose of sealing the gaps? and does anybody know how long electrical tape will last on a car?
or if anybody else has a good idea? I really don't want to spend much and I don't want it to be messy, so no silicone or other goop.
|
i would not use electrical tape, duct tape etc it gets gooey when it gets heated up... it might rip off the paint as well i suggest a rubber gasket to fit between the gaps
|
|
|
02-20-2024, 02:26 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,760
Thanks: 8,168
Thanked 8,948 Times in 7,390 Posts
|
Quote:
i suggest a rubber gasket to fit between the gaps
|
Pickup trucks need pool noodles.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|