03-04-2010, 02:50 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 134
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
|
How do you feel about the EPA mpg rating change in 2008?
In 2008, the EPA changed it's mpg rating methods to account for faster speeds and acceleration, A/C use, and colder temperatures. This resulted in the lowering of the mpg ratings for all cars (and particularly for hybrids). (See video on the subject: 2008 Fuel Economy Tests )
For the 26 years I've been driving, I've always regularly beaten the EPA estimates for every car I've owned long before I ever heard of hypermiling or ecomodding...just using common-sense driving.
For me, the new numbers are less informative rather than more. Now when I look at the mpg numbers in a new-car ad, my brain instantly goes into "ignore mode".
__________________
Daily driver:
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 02:54 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
You said it- same here.
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 02:56 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Honda Ecomodder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Well, I guess they're going to be more lax... but they've always been lax. Like you said most people with common sense can get quite a bit more to the gallon.
I guess it's a good thing because they won't come across as "dishonest" to their customers.
People will be much happier when they get higher than the EPA's standards.
Yet at the same time it will be worthless to those of us that actually check our fuel mileage.
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 03:05 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 134
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
|
On the plus side, since ecomodder.com is using these new numbers, it makes me look like a really great hypermiler for my two trucks even though I would call my TBSS numbers plain lousy and the Colorado number (only one so far) is just barely acceptable.
__________________
Daily driver:
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 03:21 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I can see an upside to the EPA basically mandating a lower number for all vehicles...
The next time CAFE standards are raised, the equivalent mileage of each vehicle (based on the way we all drive, and the way the ratings used to be) will actually be higher than the CAFE standards.
Since the EPA is downplaying everything, if CAFE raises the bar to 30MPG average, and the EPA averages have all gone down about 10% since 2008 changeover, that means that to meet the 30MPG standard, they'd have to be getting 33MPG by the "old" rating system.
I like.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-04-2010, 03:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Good point.
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 03:31 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Something about glass half full, et al.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 03:56 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Everybody loves to hate the EPA.
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 08:14 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
I'm pretty sure the CAFE test is different than the EPA test. Thus, you get 33 mpg on the CAFE test, but the EPA test you only get 30 mpg. They aren't the same test.
|
|
|
03-04-2010, 08:36 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
I ignore the numbers too. Always have. started in '87.
never called ecomod, but had long trips daily. Knowledge unfolds eventually. The net has helped this alot, forums like this one. Revealing the unknowns in your own car...
Once downdraft swapped out for injection, the numbers are crazier than ever.Even the horsepower numbers..it is a shame for anyone with a few years.
|
|
|
|