Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2015, 06:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
There is 10ft of travel in the landing gear? The payload is perched over a trap door????
It'd hang from the top structure, with the sides making sure the beam doesn't flex.

Quote:
The top and sides of the airframe will have to be stiffened to allow that size a hole in the fuselage. One would think.
Try bending a U-beam
That's essentially what this design is, with added aerodynamic covers.

Bottom would merely be an aerodynamic cover.

Quote:
I posit a better strategy: one 8x8.5 hatch in the side and rollers in the floor so it can be loaded like an 18-round magazine.
Which would make it heavier as you'd need a floor to support the weight, the rollers, the hatch in what would be a truss-structure to keep the aircraft from bending.
The aircraft would need equipment to roll loaded 40' containers - that'd require some heavy duty powered rollers.
Every airport would need lifting equipment that can lift 40' containers.


CoG issues could pop up when loading the containers as you'd have to load those at the extreme ends first.

The side cargo door in the C-130 was deleted @ a very early stage.
In later cargo/tanker jets, this door is above the load-bearing structure (floor and beam) and requires specialised loading equipment


Quote:
Also, airplanes are sensitive to weight distribution. The containers are a standard shape, but the weight could vary. They would have to be ordered correctly.
Exactly what's being done on ships and aircraft alike, today ...

Quote:
So... Your airframe seems to be sized for 40ft containers. Can it accommodate two 20ft containers? Another aircraft half the width for those?
It's mentioned in the patent


If the rear aerodynamic tail was made to fold up - or deleted altogether and accepting higher drag- it could mean the cargo can be rolled under the aircraft from behind, rather than the aircraft lifting itself over the containers
That should save some complexity with the landing gear.

OTOH, the extendable landing gear would also allow for some seriously outsized cargo to be carried , possibly with some fairings
It'd dwarf the Beluga or Dreamlifter.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
Lowell.B.Campbell (09-29-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-30-2015, 12:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,544
Thanks: 8,086
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
Quote:
Try bending a U-beam
That's essentially what this design is, with added aerodynamic covers.

Bottom would merely be an aerodynamic cover.
A U-channel fails by flexure of the free edges. A truss would help. In this case the inverted U-shaped fuselage might be engineered to take tension cables. With an inflated mattress in compression to inhibit flutter.

Are the containers secured by their top or bottom corners?

Quote:
It's mentioned in the patent
Oh sure, make me read the patent.

Edit: We basically cross-posted. If the containers are locked into a rigid array, that I can see.

The 40x144ft 'tarp', not so much. Maybe an inflated skin that is sucked against the bottoms of the containers?

Does FedEx have runways that will accommodate these?

Last edited by freebeard; 09-30-2015 at 01:01 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Lowell.B.Campbell (09-30-2015)
Old 09-30-2015, 10:52 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowell.B.Campbell View Post
You should look at another one of my Patents:
US8608109 - Payload use of wing to body volume in an elliptical fuselage - Google Patents
It was styled after the X48C
This would be more of a blended wing, than a lifting body, right?

Patent US8608109 - Payload use of wing to body volume in an elliptical fuselage - Google Patents
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
Lowell.B.Campbell (10-16-2015)
Old 09-30-2015, 10:56 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by markweatherill View Post
Co-pilot: Hey, what's this red button do?
Pilot: DON'T TOUCH THAT..... Oh no, not again! Bombs away!
Actually, a way of jettisoning the cargo mid-flight in case of emergency or catastrophic weight shift might not be a bad idea.

Just saw five minutes of the film "Operation Dumbo Drop" where the elephant was causing havoc. Probably just stuck in my head still.

Operation Dumbo Drop (1995) - IMDb
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2015, 05:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
jettisoning

Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
Actually, a way of jettisoning the cargo mid-flight in case of emergency or catastrophic weight shift might not be a bad idea.

Just saw five minutes of the film "Operation Dumbo Drop" where the elephant was causing havoc. Probably just stuck in my head still.

Operation Dumbo Drop (1995) - IMDb
Remind me to beef up my umbrella.I didn't anticipate cargo containers raining down.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2015, 11:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,544
Thanks: 8,086
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...nes_Flight_102

What happens when a few elephant sized military vehicles cut loose. The video is on Youtube.

Containerized cargo would be baffled, and therefore safer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2015, 10:31 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...nes_Flight_102

What happens when a few elephant sized military vehicles cut loose. The video is on Youtube.

Containerized cargo would be baffled, and therefore safer.
Terrible incident, they would fire/court-marshal the guy/gal responsible for securing the load but I think they remain on board just in case.

Make a mistake and you not only kill yourself, you kill your whole crew.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2016, 11:40 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Mukilteo
Posts: 4
Thanks: 7
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
A second patent on same airplane just got picked up by Popular Mechanics:
Boeing Designed a Strange Plane Would Suck Up Shipping Containers
Be sure to watch the video:
http://patentyogi.com/american-inven...er-deliveries/

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lowell.B.Campbell For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-13-2016), BamZipPow (01-13-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com