Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2010, 06:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
How much will a brush guard hurt FE?

I have a brush guard I want to install to keep deer out of my engine bay and headlights. How much FE can I expect to lose, if any?

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-14-2010, 06:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
While I'm not really sure, I would think that as long as it isn't wider than the current front end, the FE penalty would come mostly from the added weight.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 07:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
good to hear....It is pretty light but strong. I can easily pick it up and set it on the truck by myself.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 10:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts


I bet it will have a pretty large impact. The top five streamlines in this image pass over the car pretty much unmolested. If you stick some large diameter tubing in their path, Cd will increase. I'd imagine that the impact would be smaller on streamlines that are going to pass through a radiator or under the car, though.

Cylinders have high drag. Ellipses have lower drag, and streamlined bodies have the lowest drag. But you're not really interested in fairing each of the tubes of your bully bar, relative to the wind as presented to each tube, right?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 01:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
been thinkin about it......but it won't stick up much if any.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 08:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
I wonder about center line only wind tunnel pix. It's just a 2D slice of a 3D problem. The one center is not at all representative of what happens at both sides.

As for the OP question, the brush guard may do very little damage. The rest of the vehicle has a lot to do with cleaning up the wake. I would worry about nose shape last.

My 2c
KB
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 01:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
That's kinda the rule I have been using.....back-to-front. I figure if it does hurt a little FE then it is ok because a deer in my engine bay would be $$$$ to fix. This brush guard is my own insurance policy.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 02:30 PM   #8 (permalink)
Eco Dreamer
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Exton, PA
Posts: 104

Versa - '08 Nissan Versa SL Hatchback
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Those brushguards don't do squat for deer. The general consensus that I have heard many times is that they actually make the damage worse.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stevet47 For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (06-15-2010)
Old 06-15-2010, 03:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
I don't mean to belabor the point, but since I straightened out my twice-crashed front end last week, lean burn has been so much easier, and my FE has been 5-10mpg better. If you are okay with okay aero, then by all means, install it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
...fairing each of the tubes of your bully bar, relative to the wind as presented to each tube...
There's a much easier way. Basjoos' fully enclosed custom deer deflector, which doubles as a grille block:

http://aerocivic.com/imgs/front-3-4-z.jpg

It would also give you the opportunity to get those awful square corners off the front of your truck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 03:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevet47 View Post
Those brushguards don't do squat for deer. The general consensus that I have heard many times is that they actually make the damage worse.
Similar to what guys racing the old Porsches discovered: impact damage was usually easier to repair when they'd removed the bumpers, as the damage tended to stay more localized instead of being spread throughout a larger area of the chassis.

Well, you already have it. If you've been keeping a good gas log perhaps it will reveal a difference... and perhaps not.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Longtime Lurker Looking for Miles ZX40 Electric Micro van mods & information rmay635703 Fossil Fuel Free 49 07-06-2014 11:27 PM
Driving the Scanguage for FE Harry6 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 04-02-2010 01:51 PM
Correlation between predicted and real-world fe? Frank Lee EcoModding Central 14 02-26-2010 03:54 PM
FE Acceleration thought experiment. TestDrive Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 2 01-28-2009 11:24 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com