07-24-2015, 09:40 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longsnowsm
I agree with what the others have posted here, the answer "it depends" is true given how and why any of these things work.
|
YMMV, as it were.
Added to that is a mod changes what your car is, requiring you to change how you drive it. Conditions are always changing too, changing what your car works within, again changing how you have to drive it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2015, 11:59 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Not banned yet
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas Coast, close to Houston
Posts: 907
Blue - '03 Chevy S-10, LS
Thanks: 423
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
|
I hope it was a personal question because, as noted, there is no easy answer.
the ultragauge was the 1st and best, 80K wear tires to 50# second, grille block was third. the only thing I would like to change, but FE suffers if I do, is to be able drive faster.
I hope that if I ever get a belly pan made, I will maintain FE but increase speeds.
__________________
2003 S-10, 2.2L, 5 speed, ext cab long bed.
So far: DRL delete, remove bed mount toolbox.
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2015, 03:04 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 70
Peaty - '03 Honda Insight Jimmy - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd, Extended Cab, SL
Thanks: 22
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
Oh my, I can't believe I forgot the Ultragauge or the Scangauge as the first mod! I forget that is a mod! LOL Mandatory equipment! :-D
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Longsnowsm For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-07-2015, 08:16 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
The brake pedal is evil
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California__ Awsome: Yes
Posts: 390
Thanks: 5
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longsnowsm
Oh my, I can't believe I forgot the Ultragauge or the Scangauge as the first mod! I forget that is a mod! LOL Mandatory equipment! :-D
|
I've done my best tanks without any instrumentation. |
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 07:41 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H-Man
I've done my best tanks without any instrumentation.
|
Yes, but were they before or after the instrumentation taught you exactly how the car wanted to be driven?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 11:25 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Not banned yet
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas Coast, close to Houston
Posts: 907
Blue - '03 Chevy S-10, LS
Thanks: 423
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H-Man
I've done my best tanks without any instrumentation.
|
and how did you learn what was the best method to obtain the best? driving 900 miles has a lot of variables. impossible to determine what did and didnt work.
__________________
2003 S-10, 2.2L, 5 speed, ext cab long bed.
So far: DRL delete, remove bed mount toolbox.
|
|
|
|
|
08-23-2015, 06:43 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 17.09 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
I changed the oil in Mom's van from whatever it was - 5w or 10w30 with STP to just 0w20 - and fuel economy jumped up.
__________________
Last edited by 101Volts; 08-23-2015 at 06:57 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 02:09 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Alaska
Posts: 100
Thanks: 5
Thanked 65 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat
For myself, the two biggest mpg gains came with modifying my driving style, and modifying my route. ...
|
I changed one route I drive, because although the MPG are lower the distance is less, resulting in less gas consumption. So my average score in nothing to brag about, but lower fuel consumption is what it is all about anyway. I picked the new route based on evaluating short-trip MPG and short-trip distance -- both from my UltraGauge. I found that the gallons per trip readout doesn't have enough resolution to be useful for short trips, but the short-trip miles readout is good for this. |
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Focus-Ak For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-25-2015, 08:12 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Yep, the longest way around can be the shortest way home.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|
|
