Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2011, 10:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 39

stimpsF150 - '01 Ford F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

shifty - '12 Mazda 3 i-touring
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Idling in N vs D observations

Before I got my scangauge I had done a little testing with my generic ODB reader and had noticed that the % load indicator did show a significant difference between idling in gear vs D in my automatic. So while I don't shut off my engine at lights, I do shift into N if I know it will be a long light.

I have retested this with the scangauge by timing the amount of time it takes for my overall tank average to drop a tenth of a MPG while sitting still in N vs D.

The difference is about 30%. Which is to say that sitting at a light in N costs you 70% of sitting there in D.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stimpsonjcat For This Useful Post:
Cd (09-01-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-31-2011, 11:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
I would look at gal per hr difference I'm not sure exactly what your results were due to the wording, but on my car shifting in to N the gph increases for a short time then slowly drops down to use slightly less than when in D. I do not bother to shift into N when at a light as I will need to be sitting for about a minute for it to matter.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 11:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
I've found the only difference whether the transmission is in Neutral or Drive with the engine idling is if I'm on the brakes or not. Holding them down brings up the gph by .02 usually. So I just use the emergency brake if it's going to be a short stop. No paying for the brake light use out of my gas tank!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Any rpm difference stimpson?
__________________
EcoDriving: Turning more fuel into usable forward motion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 01:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 39

stimpsF150 - '01 Ford F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

shifty - '12 Mazda 3 i-touring
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Hmmm...i will revisit this and check the gph also.

My basic premise was that if the load drops then the fuel use should also.

I had noticed that on short trips the avg usage tends to drop fast when stopped, so i just timed how fast it dropped in N vs D.

It is probably the same math either way, but i will go look at the gph display and we shall see.

Fun tool to play with!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:34 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orange Country, CA
Posts: 102

Fiesta - '12 Ford Fiesta SE
90 day: 31.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I think it really depends on the car, I've seen people say their gph goes down in N and others say it's lower in D.
For example, in my car in D gph is about .45-.49, while in N it usually stays above .50.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843

17 i3-REx - '14 BMW i3-REx
Last 3: 45.67 mpg (US)

Blue Bob's - '19 Tesla Std Rng Plus
Thanks: 94
Thanked 246 Times in 157 Posts
It is likely to be a function of the vehicle warm-up state, somewhat specific to the make and model. In our 2003 Prius:
  • coolant below 70C - engine will run unless in "R"
  • unloaded "N" idle - runs about 0.30 gallons/hr
  • loaded "D" idle - runs about 0.60 gallons/hr
  • sometimes when stopped - "R" and pulse engine turns engine off
  • coolant 70C and above - engine can "auto off" following the multi-stage warm-up
Regardless of which car, the ScanGauge or an OBD scanner that shows mass air flow is needed to track the fuel burn. Then experiment and find out what works.

Bob Wilson
__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 11:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 39

stimpsF150 - '01 Ford F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

shifty - '12 Mazda 3 i-touring
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
New testing, fully warmed vehicle.

-Idling in N shows gph = 0.18
-Idling in D shows gph = 0.22

Quick math tells me I wait at between 6 and 12 minutes worth of lights per day.

So best case savings = 0.2 hours of idle * 0.04 gph delta = 0.008 g/day saved.

At 240 days a year driving this is 1.92 gallons.

Hmmm...doesn't seem at all worth the effort.

I will abandon this method for a few days and check overall mpg for effect.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 759

The Crimson Crawler - '04 Hyundai Elantra GLS
90 day: 36.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 221
Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts
You IDLE at LIGHTS???
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...the above discussion is one reason GM has the 6T40 automatic transmission used in the Cruze automatically shift into "Neutral" when stopped at stop lights, to reduce engine "loading" and thus improve MPG (slightly).

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
Cd (09-15-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com