View Poll Results: Gas just hit $10/gal. Are you?
|
I'd be very happy.
|
|
13 |
28.26% |
I'd be very unhappy.
|
|
20 |
43.48% |
Meh.
|
|
13 |
28.26% |
02-03-2012, 10:33 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
I agree a sudden increase would be very bad for the economy and people. However, a gradual (but faster then current) rise over 1-3 years to ~$10 would be a good thing. Nothing is going to make people change unless it hits them in the wallet.
On the other hand, I think it would be a great start if we could remove all the subsidizing of oil that is going on here so we know the actual price (well closer to at least).
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 11:05 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leduc, Alberta
Posts: 18
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
$10 a Gallon
Was sat in the local coffee shop's parking lot last weekend and watched a staggering number of full size, crew cab, 4x4 pick-up trucks parade along the drive thru each with only the driver in it.
Last edited by Woodeden; 02-03-2012 at 11:06 AM..
Reason: spelling
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 12:55 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladogaboy
Part of what prompted my asking this is that I work in a large office building (easily > 1,000 employees) and a VERY large parking lot is filled with cars every day.
|
Just out of curiousity, what percentage of those office jobs do you think could be done by telecommuting? 99%?
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 02:30 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
Posts: 384
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
Just out of curiousity, what percentage of those office jobs do you think could be done by telecommuting? 99%?
|
I'm just experimenting with it, and it's a very logical thing to do.
Bad that it's not official - yet?
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 03:22 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
|
Part of the problem is that if we do the job right and give people notice and have programs to suppot the change, the hauls of protest would get the project stoped before it ever had a chance to see the light of day.
Politicaly it might be easyer to progresively remove subsidies without notice so that the market/people could adjust.The responce to the howles of protest could be mutted by programs to support better energy efficiancy. Done right it could be done with minimum pain...
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 04:22 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
My way is the low way
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 64
Thanks: 4
Thanked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
Well, at least the pay back time for any ecomod would be much shorter.
__________________
Summer vehicle
My dad's tire pressure is much higher than your dad's!
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 09:59 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
Just out of curiousity, what percentage of those office jobs do you think could be done by telecommuting? 99%?
|
In my current office? Maybe 10%. For the rest, the workers are dealing with sensitive information and documents, so they can't work with them from home.
__________________
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 10:01 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
The vendors would never bring all those donuts and meals to my house!!!
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 10:59 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Windsor ON Canada
Posts: 373
Thanks: 21
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
|
Just like someone else said, they get by in europe and so could we, the problem is we're used to cheap gas and we abuse it. we should drive only when we have to and combine trips by taking multiple people to the store and work.
the biggest problem would be trucking. everything we buy gets here by trucks. if fuel prices go up, so does the price of the product. i dispatch semi trucks for all kinds of loads. auto parts, steel, food, furniture. etc. all of those items and more would go up in price so the demand would go down because people wouldn't be able to afford them. when that happens people lose jobs because of the low demand and there are even more unemployed/poor people. This will happen sooner than later so we all need to get ready
__________________
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 11:12 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
Or people would go back to shipping more items by train, since trains are by far the most efficient means of transporting goods. Heck, people might even start riding trains (yes, the slow ones) more often. I used to frequent Amtrak from Los Angeles to Sacramento quite often, and I can only think of one time (if I recall, sometime around Thanksgiving) when the train was more than 50% capacity. And even then, more cars could always have been added to meet demand.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ladogaboy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|