Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-15-2014, 12:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
How about the Durango/Aspen hybrids?

I know some here don't seem to like the idea of a big hybrid suv, but we are going to buy a 7 passenger 4wd that can tow 6000pounds either way. So next week I am going to go test drive a 2009 Durango hybrid. I know it's basically the same hybrid system in the Tahoe's with a 5.7 Doge V8 instead of the 6.0 GM V8. I am comfortable with the 5.7 reliability but what about the rest of those hybrid systems? This truck has 91,000 miles so maybe a little of the 100,000 mile hybrid system warranty. They only made the Chrysler hybrids a few months compared to years of the GM but a similar year and mileage Tahoe costs $10,000 more then $18,000 for the Durango. The Durango is rated 20/22, better then the 20/20 Tahoe. There are a few similar non-hybrid Aspens we are looking at for about $2500 less, although more choices. The hybrid should save us about $1000/year in fuel so I'm not worried about the initial purchase, just potential higher repairs. I see a new factory battery pack is $1820 after core charge, that is not terrible, but what about the transmission? Then I wonder if anybody has tried the normal hypermilling hybrid techniques on these full size SUVs? Can they beat the EPA ratings with a little finesse?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-15-2014, 01:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
I'd be surprised if you get many responses.

Not because it's a Hybrid SUV, but because the Durango/Aspen hybrid are rare as hen's teeth. They literally made a total of about 400 of these things.

Per Jalopnik's "rarest normal cars" article:
The Ten Rarest 'Normal' Cars (Barely) Ever Made
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
UltArc (12-15-2014)
Old 12-15-2014, 01:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
That makes me want it even more!
That is why I linked it to the Tahoe, most of the hybrid parts are the same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 05:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
It may be nice to have such a limited production car, but what are you going to do for a battery when it comes time to need one?
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 06:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Personally, id be more interested in the tahoe/yukon hybrid. As far as i know, the durango is the ONLY hybrid chrysler ever made. personally, im not too keen on buying an experiment.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 06:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
The Durango and Tahoe are the same (hybrid wise), just the Tahoe is much more expensive. It was a joint venture so just a slight difference in the transmission housing for the bolt pattern of the engine and transfer case.
So does anyone have any experience with the Tahoe version?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 07:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
The Durango and Tahoe are the same (hybrid wise), just the Tahoe is much more expensive. It was a joint venture so just a slight difference in the transmission housing for the bolt pattern of the engine and transfer case.
So does anyone have any experience with the Tahoe version?
Is it also the same as the system in the Cadillac Escalade?

A coworker had one of those and she seemed happy with it and didn't have any trouble with it for as long as she worked here. No first-hand knowledge of it though.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 08:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Here is the Wiki article on it, to me it starts to sound like landing a man on the moon which both inspires me and scares me. Then again it seems like the transmission is also used in city busses, seems if it can withstand that abuse, how hard can a Durango be on it?
Global Hybrid Cooperation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2014, 11:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I wonder if the SUVs are like the PU versions. My impression of Dakotas is that they are a mid-sized truck with full-sized fe.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2014, 09:31 AM   #10 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Limited production vehicles are a horrible idea for a long term daily driver. Sorry, I'm a parts guy and I love parts availability.

My memory of the Durango hybrid was that it was more of a stunt than anything else. Chrysler was spiraling into bankruptcy, had a minor hybrid research program going on and slapped something into production to hopefully get some positive attention, or at least look socially responsible when begging Congress for money. Having fielded a hybrid, they stopped. The practical goal of the hybrid system was to boost the available power as much as they could while boosting the EPA rating enough to say that it had been improved. I mean, really- has Chrysler ever done more than they absolutely had to on mileage? It's not their thing.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (12-16-2014), mikeyjd (01-07-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com