03-02-2021, 02:00 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Motor City
Posts: 280
Thanks: 0
Thanked 223 Times in 138 Posts
|
It's better backwards...rooftop cargo box test
This could probably get posted in a few different threads.
I have a similar box, and use it backwards, but on the top of a pickup bed. Almost an aero cap.
(Thanks mods.)
Last edited by ennored; 03-02-2021 at 11:41 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ennored For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 02:43 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
We've been saying forever that roof boxes were designed backwards. Don't know why it took until now for a company to have figured that out. Late is better than never.
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...box-18000.html
Last edited by redpoint5; 03-02-2021 at 02:53 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 03:46 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
That looks so much like a Xenomorph from Aliens !
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 05:43 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
If fish were designed like car cargo boxes :
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 07:10 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
This has been discussed in many threads before, iirc. The seemingly backward shape is because of aerodynamic stability, at least that was the answer provided (cannot find the OP though), and I think it makes sense. Safety is always more important than consumption. Apparently having cargo box "normal way" makes it self-stabilize in a headwind the same way, as darts do.
... just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to seifrob For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 07:23 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
Probably many cars would be more efficient if driven backwards. The hood and engine bay of a car make for a natural taper best utilized in the rear of the vehicle. If we didn't need crumple zones (accidents so rare as to be unnecessary to engineer for it), maybe we'd see cars designed with a more blunt front end with a taper to the rear.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2021, 07:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
seifrob: Not unreasonable. OTOH if the roof-top carrier might put the whole car in the ditch, there may be larger problems.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
03-09-2021, 03:09 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 475
Thanks: 80
Thanked 217 Times in 179 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Probably many cars would be more efficient if driven backwards.
|
So the cargo boxes are properly originally mounted, its just we are driving the wrong direction?  |
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to j-c-c For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 12:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
driven backwards
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Probably many cars would be more efficient if driven backwards. The hood and engine bay of a car make for a natural taper best utilized in the rear of the vehicle. If we didn't need crumple zones (accidents so rare as to be unnecessary to engineer for it), maybe we'd see cars designed with a more blunt front end with a taper to the rear.
|
After pondering a flight of aircraft, Carl Breer considered their shape, with respect to efficiency, eventually leading to the development of Chrysler's 1934 Airflow series automobiles.
Model wind tunnel testing revealed that their DeSoto sedan had lower drag backwards. And as a publicity stunt, leading up the the debut of the Airflow, they hired race car driver Harry Hartz to drive a 'backwards Plymouth', coast-to-coast to to run the concept home with American motorists. The 'backwards' car had a higher top speed and better fuel economy.
Mythbusters tried this with a Porsche 928. I haven't seen the episode.
In 1996, Ford Thunderbird, Winston Cup Series, NASCAR, team owner, Robert Yates commented in a CIRCLE TRACK Magazine article that, their cars, as 'teardrops', would go much faster backwards. 
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-10-2021, 01:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
Here's how you improve MPGs with a trailer.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
